Activity › Forums › Storage & Archiving › Anyone installed or migrated to Lion-based Xsan?
-
Anyone installed or migrated to Lion-based Xsan?
Posted by Eric Hansen on October 11, 2011 at 6:31 pmHey All
Wondering if anyone has installed a fresh system, or done a migration to Lion-based Xsan. With the software price point dropped, clients are asking me about Xsan again.
thanks
e
Eric Hansen – https://www.erichansen.tv
Bob Zelin replied 14 years, 6 months ago 3 Members · 3 Replies -
3 Replies
-
Bob Zelin
October 12, 2011 at 1:00 pmthe only thing “free” is the user license. You still need the fibre array, the QLogic switch, the fibre cards, a metadata server (2), two networks and the fibre network, and of course – the knowlege to do all of this. So how much cheaper is it to build an XSAN system today – for a 6 seat system, you save $6000. Otherwise, the price is the same as before.
Bob Zelin
-
Allan White
October 26, 2011 at 5:24 pmBob, you see things clearly as always. Have you heard anything about how reliable the new XSAN/Lion server is working for people?
We have the physical infrastructure paid for; what interests me now is the cheaper seats. With the new Thunderbolt-to-FC adapters, that’s opening up some neat new possibilities for some of our people with Thunderbolt-equipped machines. But, that’s a lot of new newness at once, so thought I’d ask the experts. =)
– Allan White, Video Producer, Luis Palau Assoc.
Quad 3Ghz Mac Pro, 10GB RAM, X1900 GPU, XSAN, CatDV Server
-
Bob Zelin
October 26, 2011 at 11:10 pmI unfortunately do not know one person who is running XSAN that has upgraded to OS X Lion.
Jordan Woods on the XSAN forum is the expert on this subject.
Yes, the idea of using a Mac Mini as a metadata server with the Promise TBolt to Fibre adaptor (to go to a QLogic switch) is very appealing. But I do not know one person who has done this.Bob Zelin
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up