Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy After Effects plugins removed in 5.1

  • After Effects plugins removed in 5.1

    Posted by Tom Wolsky on March 31, 2006 at 12:02 pm

    Didn’t anyone notice that support for After Effects plugins has been removed in FCP5.1.

    All the best,

    Tom

    Author: “Final Cut Pro 5 Editing Essentials” and “Final Cut Express 2 Editing Workshop” Class on Demand “Complete Training for FCP5” DVD

    Tom Wolsky replied 20 years, 5 months ago 8 Members · 21 Replies
  • 21 Replies
  • Walter Biscardi

    March 31, 2006 at 12:56 pm

    [Tom Wolsky] “Didn’t anyone notice that support for After Effects plugins has been removed in FCP5.1.”

    Probably because AE is not a universal app. Adobe has stated it will not support a Universal app until the next rev of the app which will most likely be 2007.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    https://www.biscardicreative.com

    Director, “The Rough Cut”
    https://www.theroughcutmovie.com

    Now Posting “Good Eats” in HD for the Food Network

    “I reject your reality and substitute my own!” – Adam Savage, Mythbusters

  • Bob Woodhead

    March 31, 2006 at 12:56 pm

    On Intel. Shameful gap on Apple’s part.

  • Bob Woodhead

    March 31, 2006 at 12:59 pm

    Couldn’t Apple have written some emulator for the plugs? Or would have been a Herculean effort? Let’s hope this is sorted out by the time the Intel towers are shipping. (just had a friend visit who’s up the Intel corp. ladder, & he says the towers are gonna smoke the PowerMacs for performance).

  • Walter Biscardi

    March 31, 2006 at 1:16 pm

    [Bob] “Couldn’t Apple have written some emulator for the plugs? Or would have been a Herculean effort?”

    Doubt it. Rosetta is just for full applications. I’m curious to find out if my Boris Continuum plug-ins will work or if Boris will release some sort of update to them. They’re usually very good at getting on new releases very quickly.

    Adobe has been very cool to support the new Intel machines and it’s no surprise since they are trying to be the “Apple” of the PC world with their production bundle over there.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    https://www.biscardicreative.com

    Director, “The Rough Cut”
    https://www.theroughcutmovie.com

    Now Posting “Good Eats” in HD for the Food Network

    “I reject your reality and substitute my own!” – Adam Savage, Mythbusters

  • Peter Wiggins

    March 31, 2006 at 2:14 pm

    [Tom Wolsky] “Didn’t anyone notice that support for After Effects plugins has been removed in FCP5.1”

    Yes,

    https://forums.creativecow.net/cgi-bin/new_read_post.cgi?forumid=8&postid=887498&pview=t#head

    There is a post on the Sapphire forum too, so it would be interesting to see what Gen Arts say

    Peter

    Free Motion Templates

    https://www.peterwiggins.com

  • Bj Ahlen

    March 31, 2006 at 2:57 pm

    I’m just praying that when FCP gets a Universal AE interface (API), it will be of a more recent version that can also support at least 16-bit output. Isn’t the current AE API from a really early version of AE?

  • Peter Wiggins

    March 31, 2006 at 3:06 pm

    It would be great to have 16 bit AE filters in FCP.

    Peter

    Free Motion Templates

    https://www.peterwiggins.com

  • Steve Eisen

    March 31, 2006 at 4:15 pm

    4 more weeks till NAB!

    I would not be supprised if Boris Red 4 and BCC supported Intel.

    Steve Eisen
    Eisen Video Productions
    Director-At-Large
    Chicago Final Cut Pro Users Group

  • Walter Biscardi

    March 31, 2006 at 4:46 pm

    [Dave LaRonde]
    Y’know, if Adobe was smart, they’d ALSO include an FCP-only plugin: “Export to After Effects”, which would do many — if not all — of the things that Automatic Duck does.”

    You just export an XML from FCP which it does natively. You need the Pro Import plug-in for After Effects to bring that into AE.

    So you really need Adobe to make an FCP Import Plug-in. But why in the world would they do that when Wes has already done that and it’s worth every penny Wes charges. Seems rather redundant in my book and I’m sure it would never work as well as what Wes has created.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    https://www.biscardicreative.com

    Director, “The Rough Cut”
    https://www.theroughcutmovie.com

    Now Posting “Good Eats” in HD for the Food Network

    “I reject your reality and substitute my own!” – Adam Savage, Mythbusters

  • Walter Biscardi

    March 31, 2006 at 5:16 pm

    [Dave LaRonde]
    If the use of AE was limited to big shops with lots of big jobs, I’d agree… but it isn’t.”

    I’m just a two man shop here and I’ve had the Duck for years. I use AE for all manner of jobs from freebie’s to broadcast.

    [Dave LaRonde] “There are far more places where struggling editors have to throw nickels around like they were manhole covers, and they have to ask themselves, “Should I spend the extra money to get AE AND the Duck when Motion now comes bundled with FCP?””

    If they don’t need the Duck, then don’t buy it. Motion can do a lot of the things AE can do, not all, but a lot. I use AE all the time for the 3D camera moves.

    If you can’t afford the duck, there are plenty of workarounds. But if you’re making a living doing this, then the cost of the duck should be fully paid for in one or two jobs most.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    https://www.biscardicreative.com

    Director, “The Rough Cut”
    https://www.theroughcutmovie.com

    Now Posting “Good Eats” in HD for the Food Network

    “I reject your reality and substitute my own!” – Adam Savage, Mythbusters

Page 1 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy