Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Adrenaline HD vs. FCP – Don’t want advice, just comparisons

  • Adrenaline HD vs. FCP – Don’t want advice, just comparisons

    Posted by Les Kaye on April 16, 2005 at 10:15 pm

    This was cross-posted to the COW Avid forum.
    Has anyone had enough experience with both to comment? I’m not interested in a trashing contest. What I am interested in would be first hand day to day experiences and how they compare: editorial workflow, rendering time, exports to WEB, fx handling (nesting, integration, etc). Also, I’m platform agnostic, so Mac/PC preferences don’t apply.

    TIA,
    -Les

    Martin Baker replied 21 years, 1 month ago 5 Members · 6 Replies
  • 6 Replies
  • Walter Biscardi

    April 16, 2005 at 11:33 pm

    I’m working in a situation right now where a show is being cut for SD broadcast on an Adrenaline and then I’m conforming the show for HD on my FCP / Kona 2 system. It’s working great with the Automatic Duck plug-in allowing me to open the entire AVID project right in FCP.

    The two interfaces are just different and AVID’s on board hardware does give you some realtime features that you won’t get in FCP. Really, it doesn’t matter what anyone on this or any forum says. You just need to get a local VAR to allow you to sit down and try out the two systems. Your budget and workflow will really determine what system will fill your needs. You’ll most likely also find that one interface better suits how you like to work.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Creative Genius, Biscardi Creative Media
    https://www.biscardicreative.com

    Now in Production, “The Rough Cut,” https://www.theroughcutmovie.com

    “I reject your reality and substitute my own!” – Adam Savage, Mythbusters

  • Mark Raudonis

    April 17, 2005 at 3:40 am

    You say you don’t want any advice… so I won’t give you any. I will tell you to do your own homework. Anything you hear on either this or the Avid board is going to be colored by personal opinion. Test both systems yourself. Form your own opinon. Oops. That’s advice.

    mark

  • Les Kaye

    April 17, 2005 at 5:02 am

    Thanks Walter.

  • Les Kaye

    April 17, 2005 at 5:14 am

    Thanks Mark, we are doing our homework, but we are looking for real world daily workflow experiences. Since you have reality experience, can you offer your opinions on the Pros and Cons of both systems?

    Walter’s response here, and Michael’s on the Avid COW forum, are precisely the kind of feedback that I’m looking for.

  • Zman

    April 17, 2005 at 7:10 am

    I work on both every day, here’s my +/- list for both,

    avid + fast render time, thats about the only plus it has for me.

    avid – it crashes a lot, it has a tendency to dump all your media (adrenaline thing), it’s still the same old interface and the same old edit tool (nothing new), if you loose something it can be a mess finding it (thats a PC thing really), has slow responce time (you can do something and it’s like the computer has to catch up) and the most important you are a slave to avid. avid is very expensive, to be honest I believe in a few years they will be all but dead. avid over all is a very clunky edit tool, it’s years behind the times, they did the adrenaline / DV thing to stay with FCP, but the AHD is like 30 – 40 grand with the HD box, for me adrenaline HD today is not a wise investment in a changing world, a year ago ok but not now.

    FCP + is that it’s more of a graphic tool than a stand alone edit, anything you can do on an avid can be done multiple ways in FCP, with motion and shake and livetype if you can work them all or at least some makes this system a killer. we have an Xraid for the 4 FCP’s and they scream, (on avid we have 6 on unity and we are still trying to recoupe the cash for it). FCP is much smoother over all, granted if you learn FCP correctly (many people are not well versed on FCP) you are deadly. more people are using FCP, at least in LA they are so that must say something.

    FCP – there are a few, the media management tool it sucks. avid kills them here. and the renders not staying around when you do some simple track movement is a real pain. maybe they will address some of this stuff in 5, but over all for my money and time FCP is the way to go.

    in the 2 years we have had both systems the avid has been seeing less and less work. we charge the same for both systems, fcp is new and exciting and more creative people are jumping on it.

    What are you doing with either system, commercials, features, TV sitcoms, reality show, web stuff? I do commercials, and now and again a music video, but if you have ever worked in a commercial editorial house you will know there is no BS, it’s all about being creative and billing. and these days FCP is out billing and out creating avid, in my place that is.

  • Martin Baker

    April 17, 2005 at 8:28 am

    I have several friends who work on Adrenaline and the only positive thing I hear from them is that it renders really fast. Apart from that it’s the same old Avid frustrations such as ange has described (oh and more crashes than the older Avid Meridien systems).

    When the NAB announcements are out, it might become a very easy decision for you to make as it was for us when deciding to switch from Avid to FCP after NAB 2003.

    Martin
    Digital Heaven, London UK
    ________________________________________
    Ten Final Cut Plug-ins for just $10 each
    Multicam Lite – The first multicam solution for FCP

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy