Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe After Effects 3d stacking problem in AE

  • 3d stacking problem in AE

    Posted by Tom Gomez on February 10, 2012 at 10:25 pm

    Hello folks,

    Big comp. Lots of layers. All 3d and moving around.

    Everything is moving around correctly in 3d, but for some reason AE is rendering the comp based on STACKING order among layers within the comp. So even if something is closer to camera in 3d, if the layer behind it is ABOVE it on the stacking order, it renders on top.

    I’ve experienced this before but I can’t remember how and why. Any ideas?

    thanks!

    Tom

    ================================================
    YOU can help save TimeSpace. Join the Chronos Protectorate!

    https://www.95ers.com
    https://www.SpaceAceMedia.com

    Juan Ibanez replied 12 years, 11 months ago 6 Members · 17 Replies
  • 17 Replies
  • Tom Gomez

    February 10, 2012 at 10:31 pm

    100% 3d! Still bizarre stacking…

    ================================================
    YOU can help save TimeSpace. Join the Chronos Protectorate!

    https://www.95ers.com
    https://www.SpaceAceMedia.com

  • Tom Gomez

    February 10, 2012 at 10:39 pm

    Here’s an image. The Ca and Mg is the top layer. The others are below in the layer stacking order, but obviously they’re closer to the camera… HELP!

    ================================================
    YOU can help save TimeSpace. Join the Chronos Protectorate!

    https://www.95ers.com
    https://www.SpaceAceMedia.com

  • Tom Gomez

    February 10, 2012 at 10:40 pm

    Nada. Check out this image. Ca and Mg are on top in stacking order, but all are closer to camera… Thanks Dave!

    ================================================
    YOU can help save TimeSpace. Join the Chronos Protectorate!

    https://www.95ers.com
    https://www.SpaceAceMedia.com

  • Tom Gomez

    February 10, 2012 at 10:48 pm

    Nada. Driving me crazy! I tried open GL rendering on and off. No change…

    ================================================
    YOU can help save TimeSpace. Join the Chronos Protectorate!

    https://www.95ers.com
    https://www.SpaceAceMedia.com

  • Walter Soyka

    February 10, 2012 at 11:03 pm

    Are you using layer styles? They break 3D intersection, too.

    Walter Soyka
    Principal & Designer at Keen Live
    Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
    RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
    Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

  • Walter Soyka

    February 10, 2012 at 11:06 pm

    Here’s the whole list of possible culprits, from 3D layer interactions, render order, and collapsed transformations [link]:

    Just like 2D layers, other types of layers also prevent 3D layers on either side from intersecting or casting shadows on one another:

    • An adjustment layer
    • A 3D layer with a layer style applied
    • A 3D precomposition layer to which an effect, closed mask (with mask mode other than None), or track matte has been applied
    • A 3D precomposition layer without collapsed transformations

    Walter Soyka
    Principal & Designer at Keen Live
    Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
    RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
    Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

  • Tom Gomez

    February 10, 2012 at 11:25 pm

    So it can’t render proper 3d if any of your layers are precomps with effects…

    I think that might be the culprit here.

    I have to say… that is EXTREMELY LAME of After Effects.

    Thanks Dave and Walter!

    ================================================
    YOU can help save TimeSpace. Join the Chronos Protectorate!

    https://www.95ers.com
    https://www.SpaceAceMedia.com

  • Roland R. kahlenberg

    February 11, 2012 at 12:48 am

    Move the effects into the precomp, outside of the final comp. Pre-rendering is another option if you totally need the effects in the final comp.

    Carefully creating a layer hierarchy (in the Timeline) in the final comp may also provide a viable solution.

    HTH
    RoRK

    Intensive AE & Mocha Training in Singapore and Malaysia
    Adobe ACE/ACI (version 7) & Imagineer Systems Inc Approved Mocha Trainer

  • Tom Gomez

    February 11, 2012 at 6:24 pm

    Alas… there are all kinds of crazy dependencies with expressions and so forth. Very difficult to move the effects…

    I really think Adobe needs to fix this…

    But thanks Roland!

    ================================================
    YOU can help save TimeSpace. Join the Chronos Protectorate!

    https://www.95ers.com
    https://www.SpaceAceMedia.com

  • Walter Soyka

    February 12, 2012 at 2:54 am

    [Tom Durham] “I really think Adobe needs to fix this…”

    That’d be nice — but it would mean completely re-engineering AE.

    AE is not a true 3D compositor. When you apply an effect to a 3D precomp (even if it has continuous transformations on), the layer is rasterized. This flattens the layer, so AE’s renderer is no longer able to calculate intersections.

    If true 3D compositing is important to you, please consider filing a feature request [link]. The AE team actually reads them [link], so your input is important!

    Walter Soyka
    Principal & Designer at Keen Live
    Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
    RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
    Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy