Activity › Forums › Compression Techniques › 11 minute motion video compresses to 24gig??!!!
-
11 minute motion video compresses to 24gig??!!!
Posted by Alex Jones on October 7, 2008 at 4:56 pmHi, really need some help here.
I’ve created a very basic 11 min motion video which contains a couple of video files, one at 95mb, the other 270mb. My .motn file is around 300k.
I need the movie to play on a 42″plasma 1280×768. I need the file to be small enough to fit onto a DVD?
What compression rate should I use to accomplish this?
project properties=
1280×720
16bit depth
NTSC D!/DV Anamorphic 1.20
29.97
frame rate 29.97please help!!
thanks, Alex.
Alex Jones replied 17 years, 11 months ago 2 Members · 10 Replies -
10 Replies
-
Daniel Low
October 7, 2008 at 6:33 pmHow are you playing this back – from a DVD player or from a PC?
__________________________________________________________________
Please post back saying what solved your problem. It could help others, and saying ‘thanks’ is free! -
Alex Jones
October 7, 2008 at 6:40 pmI’m planning on delivering via DVD, then they will probably play them off of laptops connected to Plasma screens.
The motion file is so simple and basic, just a couple of fly through transitions to each stage which contain the actual video.Should i place the .motn into FCP and compress from there?
-
Daniel Low
October 7, 2008 at 10:01 pmAlex,
We sort of covered this a bit before in your last post but…. – Without knowing the spec of the computers playing this stuff back it’s difficult to say what to use, if it’s only 11 minutes long you have the luxury of using a high data rate and frame size and it’ll still fit on a 4.7GB DVD (Not sure where ’24gig’ comes from?)
You also seem to have rather confused project settings:
1280×720
16bit depth
NTSC D!/DV Anamorphic 1.20
29.97
frame rate 29.97The above settings don’t make sense.
What standard/resolution is the ‘actual video’? – is it that you are using NTSC 4:3 video in a 1280×720 Motion project, or……?
__________________________________________________________________
Please post back saying what solved your problem. It could help others, and saying ‘thanks’ is free! -
Alex Jones
October 8, 2008 at 4:45 pmyes, I’m using standard 4:3 and also some 16:9 video footage in the motion project.
The final output needs to be viewed on a generic 42″ plasma at a tradeshow. So I’m looking to get the cleanest text and smoothest video I can without getting a crazy size. I re-compressor’ed the motion file yesterday in MPEG-2 and it came out at around 480MBs, a lot better!What settings would you suggest for the best output on this kind of project (motion + compressor)?
Thanks again for your time, really helping me out and having me actually enjoy this experience! -
Daniel Low
October 8, 2008 at 6:05 pmYou’re not really helping me to help you. What sort of computers will be playing this video back?
__________________________________________________________________
Please post back saying what solved your problem. It could help others, and saying ‘thanks’ is free! -
Alex Jones
October 8, 2008 at 6:42 pmSorry Dan, pretty new to all this.
Okay, 2 options for playback:
– IBM Thinkpad T60’s (using the DVD player) connected to 42″ HD plasma’s
or
– DVD players connected to 42″ HD Plasma’sSo either way, they should be playing via a DVD player?
I managed to get the project onto a DVD and play it on a 42″ plasma this morning, played fine but letterboxed? I need it to stay full screen? -
Daniel Low
October 8, 2008 at 6:50 pmRight then Al,
If you played it back directly from the T60 hard drive you could potentially encode to an HD file at 1280×720, however if you restrict yourself to DVD playback then you can it can only be at a maximum of 720×480 (16:9).
Assuming you go down the DVD route with compressor, simply choose on of the ’90 minute 16:9 (Widescreen)’ presets and that should get round rid of the letterboxing.
__________________________________________________________________
Please post back saying what solved your problem. It could help others, and saying ‘thanks’ is free! -
Alex Jones
October 8, 2008 at 6:59 pmAwesome, so simple!
Thanks again for all your help! I’ll render the file out tonight and see what i get.
I was using the anamorphic setting as I been told to use it in one of the Adobe classes I took? completely wrong? -
Daniel Low
October 8, 2008 at 7:15 pmNo, 720×480 16:9 is anamorphic. There’s loads in the compressor manual about anamorphic encoding. I’d totally recommend reading it.
__________________________________________________________________
Please post back saying what solved your problem. It could help others, and saying ‘thanks’ is free! -
Alex Jones
October 8, 2008 at 8:21 pmcool. thanks again for the help, much appreciated. Gonna go have a good read of that manual while i’m rendering my test movie. thanks again. A.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up