-
1080 24p and 1080i 24p … one more time please?
With the release of the HPX500 I’ve grown quite interested in giving my HVX200 an older brother and adding a 2/3″ chip camera to my company’s tools.
I think the yet to be released AVC-Intra compression technology is great for its memory and delivery pipeline economy. Am I right that this codec is same as the new Apple FCP Studio 2.0 4:2:2 codec? If not is this new codec by Panasonic closer to that new native codec of FCP?
It seems to me that the yet to be released HPX3000 is clearly a heftier camera is way more than double the pixels on the CCD’s. For those doing broadcast work or shooting digital films, I can see the use and need for this jump up.
But I think for me, the specs of the HPX500 serve my current clients quite nicely. Now for the growth question… As long as DVCPro100 HD codec can hang around for another 3-4 years, I’m more than willing to buy the HPX500. But I know many consumers are only buying the 1080p sets these days. DVDs are progressive and projectors are progressive… So a camera that doesn’t shoot native 1080p might see some problems in the coming years.
I’ve read and heard numerous times from the experts of the HVX200 that they are frustrated that Panasonic puts the interlace “i” in the middle of 1080i 24p. So this is my only hesitation of buying the far cheaper HPX500. To look at the spec sheets and the way the HPX3000 is being marketed, it appears as though it shoots 1080p and the HPX500 only shoots the mystery interlaced version of 1080 progressive.
Is there a difference? If so, how does it affect the picture and the final product? Can the output from a NLE eliminate this specific potential competitive advantage?
Chris Baldwin
Shoulder High Productions
Media of the World; For the World!
https://www.shoulderhigh.com
ne*********@**********gh.com