Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Better quality stills before render

  • Better quality stills before render

    Posted by Mark Richford on June 9, 2009 at 3:24 am

    Lapse of sanity? What would cause my stills (with simple motion added) to appear crappy when I render them and fine when i UN-render them? I am working on a simple DV 720×486 program, I noticed that some of my LiveType gfx were edgy and nasty, so I started playing around with settings and sizes and noticed inconsistencies in size and field pref. So I reloaded a stock DV setting into the sequence and re-rendered. Now the stills are mashugana (sp?) Starting to lose it. Can some one slap me back to the obvious?

    Mark @ MEDIACOMM

    Mark Richford replied 16 years, 11 months ago 3 Members · 7 Replies
  • 7 Replies
  • Shane Ross

    June 9, 2009 at 4:17 am

    WHen you see stills unrendered in the timeline, or in the Viewer, you see them as they are. But when you render them, they take on the characteristics of the codec you are working with, in this case, DV. DV is not a pretty codec when it comes to pictures and text.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Michael Gissing

    June 9, 2009 at 4:47 am

    And you need to be monitoring on an external interlace monitor as well to judge accurately.

    DV is an awful codec to finsh with. Better off dropping everything in an uncompressed or ProRes for the final render.

  • Mark Richford

    June 9, 2009 at 4:58 am

    But I’ve never had this problem before. I’ll try a different setting, and I am monitoring externally. Obviously a cockpit problem using fcp6

  • Michael Gissing

    June 9, 2009 at 6:25 am

    It may also be a resolution issue with the stills. What pixel aspect are they?

  • Mark Richford

    June 9, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    I’ve used square and 601 or whatever that DV one is, lower field, no dominant field. No render good. Rendered, bad.

  • Mark Richford

    June 9, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    I’ve used square and 601 or whatever that DV one is, lower field, no dominant field. No render good. Rendered, bad.

  • Mark Richford

    June 10, 2009 at 2:15 am

    That was the right direction MG 🙂 I only THOUGHT i was changing the aspect ratio of the pic. I now get that I have to change the format to “square” in the browser and then bring the clip back down to the sequence/timeline. Control clicking on the clip in the seq does nada. Thanks for taking the time to respond. ~m

    Mark @ Tropical Visions Video, Inc.
    Hilo, Hawaii
    808.989.0324

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy