Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › editing HD 4:4:4
-
editing HD 4:4:4
Posted by Michael Ruiz on January 7, 2006 at 5:04 pmCan FCP 5 edit HD in a 4:4:4 uncompressed
color space using a card such as the Kona 2/Blackmagic
for I/O? I know storage and monitoring are finacial issues,
But I’m checking to see if it is worth investing in a system to do digital
conforms.Jack Fox replied 20 years, 4 months ago 6 Members · 7 Replies -
7 Replies
-
Mark Raudonis
January 7, 2006 at 7:51 pmIn a word: Yes.
Worth investing? Compared to what? How do you define conform? It means different things to different people. How much of the process to you want to do? Color? Mastering? Audio Layback? FCP is only the tip of the iceberg. Your biggest expense will be the decks, the storage, proper monitoring (Both picure and signal), air conditioning, and of course the experienced talent to run it.
If you’ve got enough projects happening to keep the room busy, I’d say acquiring FCP is a no brainer.
Good luck.
Mark
-
Gary Adcock
January 7, 2006 at 7:53 pm[MR2005] “Can FCP 5 edit HD in a 4:4:4 uncompressed color space using a card such as the Kona 2/Blackmagic
for I/O? “yes, there are at least 10 post houses in LA using FCP and a Kona 2 for 444 editing.
Plaster City, Laser Pacific, Efilm. Technicolor to name a few.Gary Adcock
Studio37
HD and Film Consultation
Chicago, IL USA -
Jack Fox
January 7, 2006 at 10:43 pmWell the card will cost $2500, as to the hard drive how much bigger is uncompressed video compared to… say miniDV. Is it simply 5 times, or are there other factors that make it even greater?
jmf
-
Walter Biscardi
January 7, 2006 at 11:26 pm[jmf] “Well the card will cost $2500”
Kona 2 is actually about $2000 at BH Photo.com and from most other retailers. I think I paid $1,995.
Walter Biscardi, Jr.
https://www.biscardicreative.comDirector, “The Rough Cut”
https://www.theroughcutmovie.comNow editing “Good Eats” in HD for the Food Network
“I reject your reality and substitute my own!” – Adam Savage, Mythbusters
-
Gary Adcock
January 8, 2006 at 10:25 pm[Drizzt_G] “HD takes at least 5 times more storage than DV if not more.”
good point but not from someone that works in 444.
dv footage is about 3.75 mgs a second
1080p24 4:4:4 content is about 198.87 mgs a second.
1080p60 4:4:4: content is about 497.66 mgs a secondmy calculator says that is between 53x to 132.7x as much….
Gary Adcock
Studio37
HD and Film Consultation
Chicago, IL USA -
Jack Fox
January 9, 2006 at 5:19 amI have heard that considering a 770×492 CCD area on each of 3 chips the uncompressed 8-bit RGB is about 27MBytes/sec at 24fps. If this is true the difference be only 8 times native miniDV compression. Does this sound reasonable?
jmf
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up