• Apple Final Cut Pro

  RX 480 in a Mac Pro with FCPX benchmark

  Posted by Phillip Lakis on August 26, 2016 at 7:29 am

  Hey guys.

  We took a quick look at FCPX on a Mac Pro with a RX 480 inside check out the benchmark

  Thanks

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64fQ3fqxB1E&feature=youtu.be

  Host/Creator of Phillip\’s Garage – YouTube Channel dedicated to Real World testing of DaVinci Resolve / FCPX / Adobe
  Youtube: goo.gl/Itxzsm
  Twitter: https://twitter.com/phillips_garage
  Insta: https://www.instagram.com/phillips_garage

  Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

  This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  Phillip Lakis replied 10 years ago 2 Members · 2 Replies
• 2 Replies

• 

  Joe Marler

  August 27, 2016 at 11:16 am

  For comparison, below are some benchmarks I ran on a 2013 and 2015 iMac 27, comparing to an older 4Ghz Windows PC with a GTX-660. I can’t explain why the BruceX test was so fast on the 2015 iMac (about 19 sec). I re-ran it many times. It shows the danger of relying on a single benchmark which for various (and often unknown) reasons may run abnormally slow or fast on certain platforms.

  https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-gRvVr9h/0/O/i-gRvVr9h.jpg

  
• 

  Phillip Lakis

  August 28, 2016 at 8:17 am

  Thats because of Intel Quick Sync.
  It works with i5 and i7 cpu’s and it accelerates just like a GPU would.

  Its hardware encoding in short, where else a GPU relies on software encoding and the GPU to process the effect etc

  Host/Creator of Phillip\’s Garage – YouTube Channel dedicated to Real World testing of DaVinci Resolve / FCPX / Adobe
  Youtube: goo.gl/Itxzsm
  Twitter: https://twitter.com/phillips_garage
  Insta: https://www.instagram.com/phillips_garage

Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up