Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Avid Media Composer 2:1 compression vs. 1:1

  • 2:1 compression vs. 1:1

    Posted by Anthony Vamvakitis on December 14, 2007 at 1:52 am

    It’s been a while since I’ve worked on an Avid. Recently, I was given some footage that was layed off at supposedly the highest quality, but I come to find out the compression was the 2:1 variety, not 1:1. For those AVID gurus out there, is 2:1 good enough to air or is it a big compromise over 1:1. The editor who loaded it says there is no big difference, but it’s also possible that he doesn’t want to redigitize the material.

    Thanks for the info – this is going on air as a local TV commercial, but still want the quality to be really good.

    Timothy J. allen replied 18 years, 5 months ago 5 Members · 6 Replies
  • 6 Replies
  • Michael Hancock

    December 14, 2007 at 3:18 am

    2:1 is fine for broadcast. If DV25 (about 5:1 compression) can play back, 2:1 is pure gold!

    Seriously though, unless you’re doing heavy color correction or effects there’s no need to go to uncompressed. I spent two years at a TV station cutting promos/topicals/commercials etc…at 2:1 and the engineers never had a problem with it.

    What’s the original source? Beta SP, Digibeta, DV? Again, unless you’re doing really heavy color correction don’t bother recapturing. You won’t see a difference.

    Michael.

  • Terence Curren

    December 14, 2007 at 6:25 am

    Digibeta is actually a little over 2:1 compression. So you won’t be losing anything.

    Terence Curren
    http://www.alphadogs.tv
    http://www.digitalservicestation.com
    Burbank,Ca

  • Michael Hancock

    December 14, 2007 at 1:26 pm

    [Tcurren] “Digibeta is actually a little over 2:1 compression. So you won’t be losing anything.”

    I didn’t know that. Cool. 7:30am and I’m already learning stuff.

    Michael.

  • Anthony Vamvakitis

    December 14, 2007 at 4:16 pm

    Okay, great. Thank you, everybody for the information. Puts my mind at ease!

    Take care,

    Anthony

    Anthony Vamvakitis
    https://homepage.mac.com/divisionent

  • Bouke Vahl

    December 15, 2007 at 7:53 pm

    Now only if Avid could fix digitizing 2:1 on an Adrenaline…

    Bouke

    http://www.videoToolShed.com
    smart tools for video pro’s

  • Timothy J. allen

    December 16, 2007 at 3:13 am

    Digibeta is about 2:1 compression, but it’s not the same flavor or type of compression – so that’s not really comparing apples and oranges.

    Having said that, I agree with you completely that using 2:1 compression in Avid is perfectly acceptable for editing commercials. How you light the scenes will be much more visible to viewers than whether you captured the footage at 2:1 or uncompressed.

    -Tim

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy