Forum Replies Created

Page 7 of 11
  • William Edwards

    November 10, 2012 at 9:46 pm in reply to: Outboard Scopes

    I thought so too, but I have read from multiple posts that the internal monitors do not have the same quality as the internal ones to output a video that’s broadcast safe.

  • William Edwards

    November 10, 2012 at 9:44 pm in reply to: Legal Levels with a Scope and FSI

    hmm…because Avid you’d want to import with 709, not RGB. I’m not the person doing the Final Cut conform, and I didn’t know you could do RGB import.

  • William Edwards

    November 10, 2012 at 7:47 pm in reply to: Outboard Scopes

    So I have the Decklink SDI, with my monitor connected via the SDI out. How do I connect an outboard scope to my Resolve system? Out of the monitor, that’s coming out of the computer?

  • William Edwards

    November 10, 2012 at 7:45 pm in reply to: Legal Levels with a Scope and FSI

    So for ProRes, should I use the Soft Lut 64-940 with ‘Data Level’ or ‘Full Scale’?

    (Now I don’t even know why Normally Scaled is even an option.)

  • William Edwards

    November 10, 2012 at 7:44 pm in reply to: Legal Levels with a Scope and FSI

    They are outputting with FCP. Rendering out ProRes clips. I used the ‘Normally Scaled Legal Video’. When they bring in the ProRes files I rendered, there is a luma warning on the clip in Final Cut.

    I spoke to someone at Resolve, and they told me that Normally Scaled will output renders in scaled video. So Final Cut is telling me it isn’t. I wish I had an outboard monitor; one cost at a time though, ya know?

  • William Edwards

    October 23, 2012 at 3:32 pm in reply to: Proper Output for deliveries

    Should have been more clear with Sony-F3, or 700, the like.

    It’s just a little confusing with legal broadcast range and full data. Should I be outputting for people legal broadcast outputs when they are going to bring that into Final Cut, put their graphics and conform, and output? Or should I send them full data range?

    I don’t know how the output for Final Cut works exactly, and wondering your experience with that.

  • William Edwards

    October 18, 2012 at 4:41 pm in reply to: Checking workflow options

    Thanks for this Michael.

    I did some tests myself. AMA’ing the subclips just doesn’t seem to work for Symphony 6.0, when it comes to relinking. I will look into using some of your methods there. And yes, I do have QTChange. The files are Mark 3 so they have TC, but changing the tape/reel name would help a lot too.

    Thanks again.

  • William Edwards

    September 23, 2012 at 2:14 pm in reply to: AMA Workflow Double Check

    I’ve tried testing it, but I still haven’t been able to figure out the last step to up-rez my DNX36 to DNX175. How is this done?

  • William Edwards

    September 23, 2012 at 1:09 pm in reply to: NTSC downres aspect ratio problem

    I would export out of Davinci the full 1920×1080. Then create a letterboxed or center-cut version in another software application.

  • William Edwards

    September 23, 2012 at 12:57 pm in reply to: AMA Workflow Double Check

    That’s what I thought originally!!!

    The canon footage has TC already. Is it a problem though if I didn’t put reel ID on it?

Page 7 of 11

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy