Forum Replies Created

Page 16 of 72
  • Tom Sefton

    April 15, 2018 at 2:44 pm in reply to: ‘Winning’ NAB vs winning new users

    Most certainly will be using it a lot more – already use resolve and fusion for finishing our projects so this is a nice fit.

    The way I see it, black magic are going after a part of the market that isn’t too worried about shared projects and defined roles within a team; they are taking aim squarely at the people who fly solo and previously relied on adobe cc or fcpx and motion. £300 for the full resolve license which also includes fusion light and a good editor and a top of the range sound editor that doesn’t require unlearning tracks is a massive offering.

    Co-owner at Pollen Studio
    http://www.pollenstudio.co.uk

  • Tom Sefton

    April 15, 2018 at 10:21 am in reply to: amazing new capabilities IN R15

    It really does look fantastic

    Co-owner at Pollen Studio
    http://www.pollenstudio.co.uk

  • Tom Sefton

    February 24, 2018 at 9:21 pm in reply to: BVE in the UK

    I might go down on the Wednesday Steve. Will be last minute if I can make it though.

    Co-owner at Pollen Studio
    http://www.pollenstudio.co.uk

  • Tom Sefton

    February 21, 2018 at 10:48 pm in reply to: Samsung 30 TB drive

    1 – cool!
    2 – yes!

    Co-owner at Pollen Studio
    http://www.pollenstudio.co.uk

  • Tom Sefton

    February 19, 2018 at 11:52 am in reply to: H265 encoding

    Nothing. Nobody? Anyone seeing appallingly slow encode times for h265 video? Anyone actually encoding finished work to h265?

    Co-owner at Pollen Studio
    http://www.pollenstudio.co.uk

  • Couldn’t have put it better. As I put in another thread about this, if you only buy fcpx for an encoding tool at £249, if it speeds up your workflow in some cases by twice as much, it’s worth it.

    Co-owner at Pollen Studio
    http://www.pollenstudio.co.uk

  • Tom Sefton

    February 17, 2018 at 10:07 pm in reply to: iMac Pro thoughts

    Over twice as fast as resolve for encoding red raw, and adobe way behind even that. Freelancers are soon going to be using fcpx even if it’s for final export.

    I’d be really interested to see how someone goes with an egpu connected to an iMac pro…

    Co-owner at Pollen Studio
    http://www.pollenstudio.co.uk

  • Tom Sefton

    February 17, 2018 at 9:58 am in reply to: iMac Pro thoughts

    Vince LaForet just posted something really cool on his Facebook thread about the performance of the iMac pro with fcpx vs adobe vs resolve.

    Have a look – very interesting!

    Co-owner at Pollen Studio
    http://www.pollenstudio.co.uk

  • Tom Sefton

    January 26, 2018 at 9:02 pm in reply to: iMac Pro thoughts

    Nahhhh, this was beach balls for 30s whilst trying to import a single jpeg to a project that had been worked on for days. I think it was more to do with the compatibility between cc and red helium footage.

    Co-owner at Pollen Studio
    http://www.pollenstudio.co.uk

  • Tom Sefton

    January 26, 2018 at 1:34 pm in reply to: iMac Pro thoughts

    I had it twice with large projects last year where the library of footage (all red 8K and 6K raw) when imported to a cc project would slow the project to a crawl when saving, opening, closing or importing new footage. The library was around 7TB in size – contacted adobe support (which is dreadful) and they said to reduce the size of the library by either working in proxy and relinking for final export or to edit chunks together and compile at the end. Didn’t seem viable so worked in FCPX instead.

    Perhaps it was a freak, but it seemed to be an acknowledged problem at the time from Adobe; storage was fast and had plenty of space, as did scratch disks and cache so I couldn’t figure out what was causing it other than a software problem.

    Co-owner at Pollen Studio
    http://www.pollenstudio.co.uk

Page 16 of 72

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy