Forum Replies Created

  • Tomas Bocking

    August 15, 2013 at 12:59 am in reply to: RAID Recommendations for DaVinci Resolve

    Finished, operational, everything done.

    I leaning either a bad ram stick on the card or a faulty card altogether.

    It sucks really bad, because I bought this in the States but Im now in argentina. So I need to take it to the importer to send it back, so it might take some time, but is so frustrating.

    Thanks for all your help I greatly appreciated.

    Thomas

  • Tomas Bocking

    August 14, 2013 at 11:13 pm in reply to: RAID Recommendations for DaVinci Resolve

    Here is the bonnie result

    Nas@davincinas bonnie++-1.97.1]$ ./bonnie++ -d /media/237c8e42-381d-48ac-bde7-49991a35bfd6/ -c 8 -r 16000 -n 100
    Writing a byte at a time…done
    Writing intelligently…done
    Rewriting…done
    Reading a byte at a time…done
    Reading intelligently…done
    start ’em…done…done…done…done…done…
    Create files in sequential order…done.
    Stat files in sequential order…done.
    Delete files in sequential order…done.
    Create files in random order…done.
    Stat files in random order…done.
    Delete files in random order…done.
    Version 1.97 ——Sequential Output—— –Sequential Input- –Random-
    Concurrency 8 -Per Chr- –Block– -Rewrite- -Per Chr- –Block– –Seeks–
    Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
    davincinas 32000M 374 98 42914 7 18793 6 3428 91 271023 36 564.8 42
    Latency 22219us 3126ms 694ms 36794us 68341us 91289us
    Version 1.97 ——Sequential Create—— ——–Random Create——–
    davincinas -Create– –Read— -Delete– -Create– –Read— -Delete–
    files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
    100 13149 72 +++++ +++ 2827 3 11350 59 +++++ +++ 1968 2
    Latency 422ms 766us 2925ms 656ms 19us 3881ms
    1.97,1.97,davincinas,8,1376513702,32000M,,374,98,42914,7,18793,6,3428,91,271023,36,564.8,42,100,,,,,13149,72,+++++,+++,2827,3,11350,59,+++++,+++,1968,2,22219us,3126ms,694ms,36794us,68341us,91289us,422ms,766us,2925ms,656ms,19us,3881ms

  • Tomas Bocking

    August 14, 2013 at 8:47 pm in reply to: RAID Recommendations for DaVinci Resolve

    I will do that, I know it should be better with the hardware raid, but Im running out of ideas and there is little left to try.

    Look what areco support sent me:

    “and it is normal that software raid is much faster than hardware raid. because software raid use system resource and system have much faster processor and more memory space.”

    I don’t know if it is funny or sad. A dedicated dual-core raid card with 4gb of ram being slower than a software raid seemed wrong hehehe.

  • Tomas Bocking

    August 14, 2013 at 8:20 pm in reply to: RAID Recommendations for DaVinci Resolve

    Is not giving a simple play of 1080 dpx, there is something seriously wrong with the setup, but I cant figure it out what it is.

    I’m about to try software raid next, since the have to do some work and then ocntinue testing, but it driving me nuts!

    Thanks for the help,

    Thomas Bocking

  • Tomas Bocking

    August 14, 2013 at 7:32 pm in reply to: RAID Recommendations for DaVinci Resolve

    I’ve tried both xfs and the last version of ext4 tools that would allow over 16tb volumes with pretty much the same results.

    Any ideas?

  • Tomas Bocking

    August 13, 2013 at 5:16 pm in reply to: RAID Recommendations for DaVinci Resolve

    Yes but the system was not showing these symtoms when working connected to a san.

    I’m having problems now that I have put a raid card in and tryng to make it work locally.

    Any insights about the raid creation process?

    Thanks a lot

    Thomas

  • Tomas Bocking

    August 13, 2013 at 5:04 pm in reply to: RAID Recommendations for DaVinci Resolve

    Margus, Joakim and Paul thank you so much for your help, but I keep having performance issues, very inconsistent playback framerates.

    Lets see if you could identify anything I might be doing wrong:

    Hardware:

    Dual Xeon
    Display card fx3800
    GPU card: fx5800
    12gb ram
    Areca 1882x
    11x 2TB Seagate Barracuda 7200

    RAID info:
    Raid level 5
    Stripe 128k (this is the max it will allow)
    Block size 512
    Cache attribute = Write-back
    Write Protection = Disabled
    Tag Queuing= Enable

    Steps to create the file system
    Parted:
    Partition table GPT
    mkpart primary 0.0TB 20.0TB
    create filesystem: mkfs.xfs -b size=4k -l lazy-count=1 -d su=128k -d sw=10 /dev/sdb1
    Mounting: mount -o inode64 /dev/sdb1 /media/LocalMedia/

    Is anyone able to identify something that might be giving me such a crappy performance?

    Thanks in advance and thanks again for everyone who collaborated in this thread.

    Tomas

  • Tomas Bocking

    August 9, 2013 at 2:39 pm in reply to: RAID Recommendations for DaVinci Resolve

    Thank Margus, yes I have been reading the forums, looking for information.

    Wht I found on review sites is that the performace of ext4 seems better than xfs.

    I KNEW that xfs was a must for video editing, has anything changed regarding ext4, is it better than xfs?

    Thanks

    Thomas

  • Thanks Dan, got the dvd.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy