Thanks to both Mike and Chris!
Question for Michael:
I’ve read about what you’re saying, which to me means there should be no interlace artifacts. However, I still have interlace artifacts that I don’t have on the progressive footage in native form. Am I missing something or does this mean we shot in interlaced in 1080?
Question for Chris:
Why exactly would you have stayed on 1080? Even considering interlace doesn’t handle movement as well as progressive.