[Suzi P.]

Thanks, Jason.

In my test, the interviews don’t look as sharp as I’d like when going up to 1080. I think I’m going to go for 720. The final piece will be hosted and embedded through Vimeo. The most easily discernible downside is that the piece won’t be able to be watched as “big” — is this correct? Thanks 🙂

[Suzi P.]

Thanks, Nick.

I’m forcing myself to get to know keywords better! Seems like I just have to get with the program.

[Suzi P.]

Thanks, Shane. Any chance I can lure you over to my recent thread: “1 project: 2 sizes and frame rates — Best solution?” I’d love your input! Thanks 🙂

[Suzi P.]

Hi Jason,

Thanks for your insight. I have a lot of broll shot at 720 — that won’t be as sharp as the interviews. What the downside would be of editing in 720? AND / OR — Is there a chance that I can edit in 720 and then paste the finished timeline into a 1080 (let it render) and then export? Could that also achieve the same results as starting in 1080? THANK YOU!

[Suzi P.]

Thanks, Jeff. I’d like to go bigger but hopefully it won’t go too soft. Are there downsides to editing and exporting in 720? Is it better for Vimeo to crunch down a 1080?

[Suzi P.]

Hi Mark,

Thanks — I often find that renaming in the inspector renames the entire clip — versus being able to pull out parts. I’ll better look into markers.

[Suzi P.]

Hi Noah –

Per edited clip — which is probably a line or two.

[Suzi P.]

Eric,

I know it’s been awhile but what did you eventually sort out with the HM100U?

I just ordered it and find the preamps to be very hissy. So hissy, that if JVC doesn’t swap it, I’ll have to run my interview audio through an external recorder … a major bummer. I even tested with multiple external mics … in a sound booth.