I sat here last night with my teenage daughters curiously reading the questions because I thought this would enlighten them as they are preparing to head to college in a year and 2 years and then out to the world at some point.
I got to thinking not really about the questions, but the job market itself and the methodology of interviewing. And Grin, as bold as he is, has the confidence in his abilities – and the skills to back it up. This is a big difference between a smarta** without the chops – thinking the world owes him something. I also remember my first job being told in my 1 year review “you’re getting a $.50/hr raise. We’re a stepping stone station and expect you to move on.” They admitted they placed no value on the employees. And after the Enron stuff, it seems apparent to me that it’s like a “we’ll play nice together, but who’s going to screw who first” kind of mentality between employees and employers.
With the glut of candidates available due to layoffs & closures everywhere, I think anybody who walks in should have the skills they say they do and Google is just cutting to the chase. Sure, they’ll get around to the typical interview stuff and do their due diligence with references, but they want to know who you really are. This is way better than the psych tests most corp places put you through. It is a stupid game as Grin mentions, but potential employees better know how to navigate through it. Maybe candidates better brush up on the questions they ask at the interview to include some of this type of stuff specific to their business.
PS- if you are the web developer at businessinsider.com you probably don’t have a chance of getting into google. That page has some of the worst navigation ever.
Steve

