Forum Replies Created

Page 60 of 426
  • Steve Connor

    April 23, 2017 at 6:49 pm in reply to: Adobe updates

    [andy patterson] “I have not used FCPX in a couple of years. The last I knew the titling tool in FCPX’s titling system did not have any drawing tools. I don’t think the 3-D titling tool uses ray-tracing but imitation 3-D instead. Create a metal hexagon in FCPX’s titling tool and make a glass title slide in front of the chrome hexagon and post the result here on the cow.”

    Not having drawing tools doesn’t mean it “sucks ass”

  • Steve Connor

    April 23, 2017 at 6:37 pm in reply to: Adobe updates

    [andy patterson] “Having said that with out any type of 3-D design tools FCPX’s titling tool sucks ass. That is the first time I actually said anything negative about FCPX but it is true.

    So you have experience using FCPX to back this up?

  • Steve Connor

    April 23, 2017 at 6:28 pm in reply to: Adobe updates

    [andy patterson] “I could just as easily say FCPX’s titling tool is stuck in the 1980s but talk is cheap. What can you do with FCPX’s titling tool that I cannot do with the titling tool of Premiere Pro CS 4.0?”

    Have you USED FCPX Andy?

  • Steve Connor

    April 13, 2017 at 11:13 am in reply to: Apple working on new Mac Pro
  • Steve Connor

    April 7, 2017 at 8:25 am in reply to: Apple working on new Mac Pro

    [andy patterson] “Apple does not have to be innovative when they have fanboyism and brand loyalty.”

    Seems Microsoft have their own fanboys too

    Perhaps we should start calling people “Advocates” instead?

  • Steve Connor

    April 7, 2017 at 8:01 am in reply to: Apple working on new Mac Pro

    [andy patterson] “The information is very easy to find on the internet. I could have been lazy and not bothered to look for the solution. Those that don’t bother to look are really just looking for an excuse to bad mouth Windows. I would like it to be easier to stop the updates but in the year 2017 to complain about an issues that doesn’t really exist seems odd to me. If you need help with FCPX, BMD or even AJA what do you do? You find the solution online. Why do you think these forums are here. Is this just a place for you to rant or do you ask for advise and give advise? I try to help on the Premiere Pro forums when I can.

    The one to bring balance to the forum he is 🙂

  • Steve Connor

    April 7, 2017 at 7:26 am in reply to: Apple working on new Mac Pro

    [Scott Thomas] “You make it sound like there’s an office on a lower level at Microsoft with a sign on the door saying “Beware of the Leopard” that has the info I need to stop these incursions.”

    You sir are a hoopy frood 🙂

  • Steve Connor

    April 4, 2017 at 5:18 pm in reply to: New Mac Pro!

    Wow, Apple reveals future plans, very impressed and encouraged by this

  • Steve Connor

    April 1, 2017 at 4:59 pm in reply to: FCP X at NAB – North Hall presentation.

    Sadly an April fools joke

  • Steve Connor

    March 31, 2017 at 3:34 pm in reply to: OT: Time to say goodbye?

    [Andrew Kimery] “With regards to getting “separated from your ability to use or adapt the Intellectual Property you’ve created and should therefore own.” What about when you rent post/production gear? Or when a client hires (aka ‘rents’) you for a job? After the agreed upon term/duration is up what happens? Do you get to access to the rental gear indefinitely free of charge because losing access to the gear means losing access to your IP? Does the client get access to you indefinitely free of charge since losing access to you means losing access to their IP?”

    The IP argument is simply a stick for people to beat the subscription model with in the same way the magnetic timeline is used as a stick to beat FCPX by the haters.

    It’s all bull plop 🙂

Page 60 of 426

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy