Steve Connor
2
Apple Final Cut Pro X Coins
2
COW Coins
Forum Replies Created
-
[Robin S. Kurz] “… and I immediately know that even the most “extreme free” anything could NEVER get me back to the clearly inferior concept of “tracks” (never mind the ghastly, convoluted GUI). But to each his own, right? If Resolve best meets your needs, great! Go for it! All the power to you. Just suggesting it’s anywhere CLOSE to being some sort of ominous doomsday competition to FCP… oh puh-leeze. I’d say you’re making a fool of yourself.”
Nice to see Robin back isn’t it 🙂
\”Traditional NLEs have timelines. FCPX has storylines\” W.Soyka
-
[Bob Cole] “I have, so far, only been “dating” Resolve, mainly due to performance issues. It always seems to require a more powerful computer than whatever I have. I could make that happen today, with a desktop machine. But I need Resolve to run, and run well, on a laptop, preferably a Mac. When that happens, I’ll buy that laptop, install Resolve Version Whatever, and… get married.
“Been editing with Resolve 15 on a 2013 MacBook Pro and I have to say it’s working really well, it’s certainly worth downloading 15 onto whatever you have to take it out on another “date”
\”Traditional NLEs have timelines. FCPX has storylines\” W.Soyka
-
[greg janza] “Most projects that I work on end up fully colored and sound mixed in the rough cut/fine cut stage because it seems that clients nowadays have a very hard time watching cuts that look off or sound incorrect.”
So VERY true!
\”Traditional NLEs have timelines. FCPX has storylines\” W.Soyka
-
Doesn’t look like they’ll be supporting ProRes 4K any time soon though
(6’35” in)
\”Traditional NLEs have timelines. FCPX has storylines\” W.Soyka
-
I’ve been playing on it with a short film I’m in the final stages of and I have to say I’m very impressed with the speed so far, noticeably faster and smoother than V14 for me on my 2013 MB Pro. It’s very, VERY usable so if it’s stable then I shall be using it for a lot more finishing work on my FCPX projects.
If I was a PPro Subscriber I’d certainly be thinking about switching
\”Traditional NLEs have timelines. FCPX has storylines\” W.Soyka
-
Looks great, if only it could work in reverse and enable me to export stock clips to Pond 5 as well though
\”Traditional NLEs have timelines. FCPX has storylines\” W.Soyka
-
[Scott Witthaus] “And it’s still Resolve editorial which I gave up on (performance) a few versions back.”
They’ve really done well with the performance issues it had, it’s still not a smooth as FCPX on a lower power system but it’s very usable and in my brief time playing with V15 it seems even faster!
\”Traditional NLEs have timelines. FCPX has storylines\” W.Soyka
-
Well that about covers it then! Excellent article with some great depth.
Cue post from Bill about that’s what he’s been saying about FCPX all along 🙂
\”Traditional NLEs have timelines. FCPX has storylines\” W.Soyka
-
[Craig Seeman] “For today’s pointless prediction:
The new Blackmagic Pocket Cinema 4K will support at least one flavor of ProRes RAW quite possibly eschewing cDNG. It makes sense given the limits to data rate BMD may have faced in doing a small 4K camera.”
Sorry Craig, already made the same pointless prediction ☺
https://forums.creativecow.net/readpost/335/100858
I think Resolve 15 will almost definitely have ProRes RAW support
\”Traditional NLEs have timelines. FCPX has storylines\” W.Soyka
-
[Michael Gissing] ” This forum isn’t and never has been despite recent attempts to banish us pesky debaters.”
No-one is trying to banish anyone!
\”Traditional NLEs have timelines. FCPX has storylines\” W.Soyka