Forum Replies Created

Page 2 of 2
  • Stephen Hall

    March 9, 2011 at 11:14 pm in reply to: Sennheiser ENG wireless EW112-p G3 series

    You may also want to have a look at Guy Cochran’s overview of the G2 wireless set. They’re probably similar enough that it will be good jump start.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyVAjZq9HF8

    Cheers,

    Stephen H
    https://sound.facesproject.org/

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Stephen Hall

    March 6, 2010 at 1:05 am in reply to: A site like Youtube for audio files?

    Hi Rick,

    I’ve uploaded some clips for others to use at Freesound.org – https://www.freesound.org/

    There are some gems there and some awful junk, too, but it’s nice to find the occasional sound effect clip there.

    Cheers,

    Stephen H

  • Stephen Hall

    September 4, 2009 at 8:54 pm in reply to: Microphone Similiar to Rode NT3

    Hi Adam,

    You might want to look at the Audio Technica AT-4053a (I hear there’s a 4053b variant out now).

    It’s a nice hypercardioid and runs about $ 499 at most places. Sounds really good and it’s much lighter in weight than the NT3.

    Best of luck,

    Stephen H

  • Stephen Hall

    September 12, 2008 at 6:22 am in reply to: Edirol R4Pro

    Hi Greg,

    I don’t know if my first reply made it or not… Anyway, I’ve used the Edirol R4 Pro in a number of indie film productions and it’s been great.

    The quality of the recorded sound is very high, at least when used in the mode I use it — with a Sound Devices 442 mixer.

    It’s not ideal for use in a bag like the SD 744T and it’s not quite as robustly built as the SD. Some controls are on the top panel and require a bit of a reach, but of course it’s much less expensive than the Sound Devices recorder.

    Having said that, the Edirol is great as a backup for in-camera sound on indie shoots: I’ve found that the camera audio settings can be easily mismanaged and having a pristine recording can save the day. I feed the Edirol with the SD 442’s four direct outputs (line level) into the Edirol’s inputs.

    Here are some examples from recent shoots recorded with the Edirol R4 Pro:

    https://www.facesproject.org/loc_sound/s_hall_sound_examples.html

    If you have any other questions, I’ll be glad to try and answer.

    Cheers,

    Stephen H

Page 2 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy