Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 2
  • Simon Graham

    August 9, 2015 at 7:34 pm in reply to: Mercalli SAL V3 – Video Stabilisation

    [Wayne Waag]

    Sorry, didn’t mean to accuse you of anything, thanks for the screenshot and for your advice.

    Downloading Mercalli V2 Trial now, thanks.

  • Simon Graham

    August 9, 2015 at 5:07 pm in reply to: Mercalli SAL V3 – Video Stabilisation

    [John Rofrano]

    Nice idea, will give this ago. Thanks.

    [Wayne Waag] “Wrong. It works just fine for both 2.7K and 4K–just tried it.”

    Really? On the proDAD website comparison between v2 and v3 it says the opposite, look at bottom of page – https://www.prodad.com/home/products/video_optimization/300580322,l-us.html

  • Simon Graham

    August 9, 2015 at 12:46 pm in reply to: Mercalli SAL V3 – Video Stabilisation

    I much prefer plugins myself, however Mercalli V2 lacks 2.7k and 4k support which is kind of a deal breaker for me.

    Any thoughts on Q1?

  • Simon Graham

    July 17, 2015 at 9:39 pm in reply to: GoPro: Source media with different frame rates?

    "Mix all you want! Not a problem, lol

    Have you not read our comments?
    However converting 30fps to 60fps would not be too advisable."

    I have read them all, so your now suggesting that I can’t mix all I want.

    So if I have 30 and 60fps I should render at 30fps? And I should avoid 24/48fps if rendering at 30fps?

    Thanks everyone for your help.

  • Simon Graham

    July 17, 2015 at 1:35 pm in reply to: GoPro: Source media with different frame rates?

    Thanks, though isn’t there issues with converting odd framerates?

    Eg: 48fps -> 30fps

    Should I avoid 24/48fps if output is 30fps?

    Also does converting 30fps to 60fps not result in ghosting/less smooth video?

  • Simon Graham

    December 13, 2014 at 8:30 pm in reply to: New Camcorder: Will This Work ?

    [John Rofrano] “It will “work” but probably not be smooth depending on your computer. You’re asking Vegas Pro to transcode the video on the fly and it will never be smooth. The footage that matches the project will be smooth and the footage that doesn’t will not.

    I would suggest you be prepared to transcode your non-1080p footage to 1080p. If you are looking to reframe the 4K footage, then do your reframing in a separate project, render to 1080p, and then drop that into your main project fro editing. It will be a much smoother experience.

    BTW, Sony recommends at least 8-Cores and 16GB memory for 4K editing. Is your computer up to the task?

    Thanks John, that makes sense.

    Any suggestions for getting slow-motion to work? The way I see it, I can only slow down until frame rate matches the project. With 120fps max, my project can either be 30fps or 60fps (the latter only being x2 slow motion). Is my only option a more expensive camera, that can shoot say 240fps?

    Pc is only a hex core with 16gb ram, but may upgrade if necessary.

  • Simon Graham

    August 4, 2014 at 7:58 am in reply to: Where can I download Sony’s ‘Red Car’ test?

    Here you go: https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/24/973364

    Or for direct Link: https://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/vegaspro12benchmark

    The link is still active, just not displayed on their site.

  • Simon Graham

    August 2, 2014 at 4:10 pm in reply to: XDCAM EX vs MainConcept

    Thanks for the reply Dave.

    I have searched all other related threads but none mention the use of XDCAM EX for upload to YouTube.

    Render time is very important to me and so using XDCAM EX would be useful with it being 3x faster.

    I know MainConcept Internet HD is the recommended template and the bitrate can be increased but as I’ve said above, render speed is an important factor.

    Any advise on the differences between the 2 templates or any negatives as to why I shouldn’t use XDCAM EX, excluding the higher bitrate.

  • Simon Graham

    July 7, 2014 at 10:50 am in reply to: “Render As” Speed – CPU vs GPU

    Thanks Dave,

    I’ve had a look into the xeon processors and for my budget it looks like the i7 is the way to go.

    Ive ordered all my parts apart from the graphics card: HD 6970 vs R9 290

    Does anyone have any experience with XDCAM EX vs MainConcept for upload to YouTube?

    Thanks again everyone.

  • Simon Graham

    July 4, 2014 at 9:06 pm in reply to: “Render As” Speed – CPU vs GPU

    Okay 6 cores it is then, thanks for the advice.

    Any opinion on XDCAM EX + R9 290?

    Going by that table I linked to earlier it supports GPU acceleration with the advantage of being a much newer card. Though I have never used XDCAM EX, is it comparable to MainConcept apart from higher/fixed bitrate? Video is for YouTube only.

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy