Forum Replies Created

Page 98 of 124
  • Shawn Miller

    April 17, 2012 at 3:16 pm in reply to: This also changes everything!!!

    [Todd Terry] “It does look like something that many production companies (including my own) might strongly consider as a “B” camera, but probably not as a primary.”

    Agreed. On first impression, this looks like a great VFX camera. Would love to do some chromakey tests using CinemaDNG.

    Shawn

  • Shawn Miller

    April 17, 2012 at 2:56 pm in reply to: This also changes everything!!!

    [Steve Connor] “I think he’s talking about the magnification factor, the lens will still work it just won’t be that wide.”

    [Chris Kenny] “It’s going to be hard to get very wide on this camera.”

    Yep, I believe I pointed this out. FOV will be more narrow… but I think this is different from saying that there will be fewer choices of wide angle lenses for this camera.

    [Martyn Greswolde] “I think the crop factor will be more like 2.3-2.5x which is a real issue.”

    Compared to a full frame stills sensor, yes. Compared to a Cinema 35 sized movie sensor, probably more like 1.20:1.

    [Martyn Greswolde] “my 16-35 will suddenly be 37mm on the wide end”

    No, the focal length doesn’t change at all, the characteristics of the lens will remain the same. Smaller sensors don’t magnify the picture, they resolve (or crop) a smaller portion of the image.

    [Martyn Greswolde] “also, the lack of DOF will be a big issue too”

    To match the DOF of a larger sensor at a given distance, you adjust the apeture. In this case, it should be 1/4 stop up (or so).

    Did anyone feel that Black Swan lacked for wide shots or shallow DOF? If not, using a sensor that’s larger than Super 16 shouldn’t be an issue.

    FWIW, this issue has been discussed at length on dvxuser.net. Below are links to two threads that may be of interest.

    https://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?226973-Wide-angle-reality-check

    https://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?227826-Relative-Focal-Length-Angle-of-View-and-CCF-Chart

    Shawn

  • Shawn Miller

    April 17, 2012 at 8:04 am in reply to: This also changes everything!!!

    [Morten Ranmar] “A smaller sensor size limits the choices of wide angles.”

    Sorry, I don’t follow. How does a smaller sensor limit the choices for wide angle lenses? A 14mm lens designed for FF (stills) or S35 or even MFT will still cover a smaller sensor or film format… the FOV will be more narrow, but it will still work. Am I missing something?

    Shawn

  • Shawn Miller

    April 17, 2012 at 6:42 am in reply to: This also changes everything!!!

    [Morten Ranmar] “Just a shame the sensor is actually smaller than four-thirds.”

    By a few millimeters, yes (17.8×10 vs 15.6×8.8) but still larger than
    Super 16. Honestly, I think the ability to shoot in CinemaDNG is a much bigger deal than the sensor size. But that’s just my opinion. 🙂

    [Morten Ranmar] ” This makes most Canon lenses unusable…”

    Why is that? A smaller sensor means that more lenses will cover it not fewer… plus, the camera comes with a choice of EF or F-Mount.

    Shawn

  • Shawn Miller

    April 16, 2012 at 7:14 pm in reply to: This also changes everything!!!

    [Tero Ahlfors] “How can I use this with a Windows machine?”

    SSD to USB adapter or BlackMagic Design’s HyperDeck Studio.

    Shawn

  • Shawn Miller

    April 13, 2012 at 1:50 am in reply to: Questions for CS6

    Thanks for the response, Dennis. I appreciate how busy you must be at the moment! I hope you all have a great show.

    Shawn

  • Shawn Miller

    April 13, 2012 at 12:28 am in reply to: Questions for CS6

    Thanks John,

    This is very cool. I’m looking forward to playing with it for myself. I don’t expect the built in camera tracker to be as powerful or flexible as Syntheyes… but it’s a nice feature to have nonetheless.

    Thanks

  • Shawn Miller

    April 12, 2012 at 9:23 pm in reply to: Questions for CS6

    Thanks Dennis

    I have a question about the camera tracker. After you resolve a shot in AE, can the tracking information be exported into a scene file for other 3D applications like Maya or Cinema 4D?

    Shawn

  • [Jason Dare] “https://discussions.apple.com/message/18014384#18014384#18014384

    Life is too short!”

    For those of us without an Apple ID… what’s the gist of the conversation? 🙂

    Shawn

  • [Allan MacKenzie] “it’s interesting, surely I’m not the only pro that prefers using PC window based operating systems that encounters this issue? or am I truly an island, unique, lol :)”

    I don’t think you’re alone here, my company/team is PC based too. But we’ve never run into a situation where a file based deliverable can only be created on one platform. We’ve been asked for ProRes files before, but when we tell vendors that we can’t create it, we’ve been able to agree on a suitable substitute (DnXHD, Blackmagic, Uncompressed, DVCProHD, etc.). Not sure why Getty can only work with ProRes… that seems strange.

    Shawn

Page 98 of 124

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy