Shane Wilm
Forum Replies Created
-
Kirk, did mean to say the HVX200 Film back was 4.6809 x 2.6330 CM? and not MM?
Were getting better results tracking using a film back in Cm’s
Kirk, did mean to say the HVX200 Film back was 4.6809 x 2.6330 CM? and not MM?
Were getting better results tracking using a film back in Cm’s
We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy