Forum Replies Created

  • Sempoo

    September 12, 2006 at 12:51 pm in reply to: why mixdown is longer?

    There is *no silence* anywhere – all tracks start perfectly at 0:00.000 (even at 0 samples).

    It is rather theoretical problem (mixing in DAW – only “numbers”?), but for creating seamless loops it IS important.

  • Sempoo

    September 12, 2006 at 10:43 am in reply to: why mixdown is longer?

    Longer means here: silence added at the end of mixdown, NOT time stretched.
    How much silence?
    The longest track in session is 30.000s (1440004 samples) while mixdown is 30.032s (what is 1536 samples more).
    I also noticed, that when I turn off VST – the mixdown is much more close to the longest track – it is not 1536 samples longer, but let’s say 30-50.
    I understand real-time latency, but why there is no VST delay compensation WHEN rendering?

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy