[Bill Davis] “And honestly, if you’re willing to trade the efficiency and extra productivity for some vague “appearance to others of professionalism” then I doubt X will ever be the tool for you.
“
So true. Who cares what it looks like? My clients hire me for the finished product, not how it gets there. They trust me for taking care of their project, workflow and budget, and when I said I was ditching Avid, they were cool. When I said I was ditching FCP7, they were cool. They just care about their product and the process and price getting there. For me, X is the best tool for the my clients based on my judgement, not theirs.
This “Fischer Price” argument is ridiculous. If you are worried about the look more than the process and final product, there is a problem. You should be editing on a Q-Box, Smoke or Flame (DS, if you can find one). They looks WAY more complicated, therefore better, right?
Scott Witthaus
Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
1708 Inc./Editorial
Professor, VCU Brandcenter