Forum Replies Created

Page 111 of 137
  • Scott Witthaus

    September 12, 2014 at 11:18 am in reply to: Did anyone see the Moviola Webinar on Resolve 11

    [Jamie Franklin] “Interesting how it becomes all about you.”

    Actually, it really is all about the individual and what works for them. So yes, it’s about me. I could really care less that X doesn’t go to tape or lacks an ugly audio meter and mixer. Not my workflow. I don’t want Apple, IMO, to waste time developing those capabilities.

    OTOH, for some, R11 is FCP8, what they always wanted with those options. That’s great and more power to them. There are plenty of products out there that fit plenty of needs.

    Just not for me, and remember it’s all about….

    😉

    regards –

    sw

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    September 12, 2014 at 11:06 am in reply to: Did anyone see the Moviola Webinar on Resolve 11

    [Oliver Peters] “OTOH, for a lot of the web videos and corporate pieces, I’ll stick with X.”

    For my commercial work for agencies, there usually is a color correct line-item in the budget. That’s not me; I’m the storyteller. We bring our stuff to a colorist, who by the way, uses Resolve! Same with audio. Broadcast goes to an audio house and an audio engineer.

    But for that web and non-broadcast stuff I wear all those hats and quite honestly X does about everything I need. I loathe the idea of moving to other platforms when it’s not really necessary. Again, I think a lot of folks feel they have to do it simply because it can be done (with varying degrees of success). An effective workflow that is clean and efficient is what I like.

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    September 10, 2014 at 10:38 am in reply to: Did anyone see the Moviola Webinar on Resolve 11

    [Jamie Franklin] “Already a better nle than fcx will ever be. Tracks. “

    Seriously? So you have R11 with lousy playback, “brutal” as you put it, lousy dissolves, crappy titles and you don’t understand compound clips. Yup, R11 must be better, by god, ’cause it’s got tracks!! Oh, and a mixer, which personally I never used in FCP7 and hated in MC so I guess I don’t miss it in X. 😉

    And how much color correction do most projects need that X or X and plugins can’t handle? That’s one thing that has amused me with the R11-love. “Gotta round trip to R11 for color.” I would say most times not. Why complicate things by forcing a round trip? I mean, I have R11 and am learning it, but until it becomes seriously better for editing, it will have limited use in my work. Of course it looks a helluva lot like X, but those damn tracks get in the way all the time….Just my early morning, one-cup-of-coffee opinion. YMMV.

    🙂

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    September 8, 2014 at 6:02 pm in reply to: Construction continues on the edit media deathstar

    [Steve Connor] “I just wish Apple would give us a roadmap for FCPX again, it’s starting to feel like very slow development compared to the pace that Adobe is setting and it’s advantages are getting slowly whittled away.”

    What roadmap did Adobe give us? Or Avid for that matter?

    Nothing here makes me jump on the Pp bandwagon.

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    September 4, 2014 at 5:53 pm in reply to: BBC adopts FCP X for news editing

    [David Mathis] “B. The cost of the subscription could go up”

    I think there is no doubt the cost will go up at some point. Get them hooked and raise the price….or else! 😉

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    September 4, 2014 at 1:35 pm in reply to: BBC adopts FCP X for news editing

    [Aindreas Gallagher] “and a lot of people have been saying for a long time that X is perfect magazine show cutter. Sounds like it’s finding a natural home.”

    Exactly.

    And for smaller station, fast cut and turn stuff, X is perfect there too. Horses for courses.

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    September 2, 2014 at 8:57 pm in reply to: OTish: Thunderbolt G-Raid runs hot

    certainly the latter…..

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    September 2, 2014 at 12:22 pm in reply to: The Question – An Update On My Choices In NLEs

    [Chris Harlan] ” I just cut an entire season of promos (23) entirely with AMA, never transcoding at all. My playback, off a MacBook Pro, and out over tBolt to multiple monitors was stellar, and trim mode was very responsive.”

    Brave man. Even Avid folks suggest that AMA is best used to just choose selects then transcode.

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    August 30, 2014 at 11:17 am in reply to: FCP X destroying audio edits in XML output

    [Oliver Peters] “I absolutely fault FCP X with this, because Apple has chosen to create a new, non-standard export format (FCPXML) instead of anything that is commonly used. It’s a neat little way of washing their hands of any problems”

    Hi Oliver –

    I can see your frustrations! Another point of curiosity. I like to avoid going to multiple systems as much as possible, to the point where it has influence in the workflow and tools. I had a gig with a producer a couple months ago that I wanted to use X for but some work had previously been in 7, so I felt it was safer just to stay there. Maybe I am off-base, but, like my project timelines/sequences, I try to keep my workflow as simple as possible. Why force an issue?

    Knowing that you needed OMF’s (which admittedly I have not supplied to an audio house in years), why did you start in X and not simply use FCP7?

    However, today I start on a project with hundreds of DSLR clips to sync. If I get audio problems, I will be cursing right there with you! 🙂

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    August 29, 2014 at 10:37 am in reply to: “Disabling” video of clip but not audio

    It would be nice, however, so select a bunch of video clips and a bunch of corresponding external audio clips and go “fetch” and it does more than one at a time. I don’t think the OP got a definitive answer on this. I am interested as I have material coming in today that will involve a couple hundred audio and DSLR video clips….and did I read right that Plural Eyes can do this?

    sw

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

Page 111 of 137

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy