Forum Replies Created

Page 102 of 137
  • Scott Witthaus

    December 3, 2014 at 1:45 pm in reply to: Fcp X 10.1.4

    5 minute overview from Ripple:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uISe-lR5sSc

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Scott Witthaus

    December 1, 2014 at 11:24 am in reply to: FCPX Dogs, New Names

    [Steve Connor] “Perhaps you both could just move to the techniques forum then and then you wouldn’t get annoyed by the name anymore?”

    C’mon Steve. Can’t take a good “debate”? I mean, if we can’t debate the debate forum, what’s left? No need to get testy. 😉

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    December 1, 2014 at 2:55 am in reply to: FCPX Dogs, New Names

    [Robin S. Kurz] ” Kill it and consolidate it with the “Techniques” forum. Done.

    Well played, Robin. I agree.

    sw

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • [Mark Raudonis] “I don’t care WHAT he edited it on… that spot brought a tear to my eye!”

    Exactly. Quite honestly, any of us could have cut this in iMovie. When I say that, I mean “technically” cut it. It’s a bunch of clean cuts in a row (with a dip to black added for good measure). But, it’s HOW those cuts were designed and paced that makes the magic. The NLE had nothing to do with this. It’s the editor and the skill of storytelling.

    A very cute spot.

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    November 26, 2014 at 7:52 pm in reply to: FCPX Dogs, New Names

    [Andre van Berlo] “As a lot feel that someone chooses to work with an NLE despite the fact it can’t do this or that.”

    When you find one that does everything, please let us know! 😉

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    November 25, 2014 at 2:12 pm in reply to: FCPX Dogs, New Names

    So Tim, what’s the name changing to?

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    November 25, 2014 at 2:10 pm in reply to: So, what did you say to the new Apple FCPX survey?

    Not sure, as it was sent to me via e-mail.

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    November 23, 2014 at 12:32 pm in reply to: So, what did you say to the new Apple FCPX survey?

    Yes, CC keyframes!

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Bill, great post. Have been doing a little work on Premiere recently, and you realize what you miss from X and didn’t know you needed before X was released!

    Having done beta-test cycles for Media Composer (and DS), yeah, the MC crowd is conservative because that workflow is solid and proven for them. And that’s a good reason not to upset the “apple” cart. Being on the beta run when the Smart Tool was released certainly re-enforced this notion (granted, it was a pretty ‘dumb tool’ when it was first released). This conservatism also has Avid using R&D dollars on doing version patches for software that may be one or two full versions old. And that slows things down too. Again, for their core market, this is a good reason not to go too fast or get too radical. It simply has to work for them.

    But that’s a small niche. What system Gravity was cut on really means nothing to me and my market (there are no Avid suites left, so MC is not even in the conversation). Coming from an Avid shop and then losing places to use that skill, I had to find a replacement, which was FCP-Legacy, and then three years ago there was another fork in the road. You pick the path of what gives your client the best product and let’s you make a profit. Might be X or not. I am keeping my Premiere chops up because there may be another fork. Same with Resolve. So yes, I am actively looking at other alternatives simply to be as marketable as I can going forward. But it has nothing to do with “Gravity” or any other blockbuster for me.

    Just my humble opine on a cold frosty morning! 😉

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    November 22, 2014 at 10:45 am in reply to: So, what did you say to the new Apple FCPX survey?

    I asked for a Send To Motion and added a request for customizable and re-usable workspace layouts

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

Page 102 of 137

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy