Forum Replies Created

  • Well, that worked! Thank you so much, Walter! Thanks for the links to the article, too!

  • Hi Walter,

    Thanks for the reply.

    I have 8GB ram (I will add another 2x4GB stick by the end of the month). 6GB is dedicated to AE.

    “Render Multiple Frames Simultaneously” is disabled.

    “Also, if you want Ae to preserve interlacing from start to finish, make sure that you are:

    1) interpreting the footage with fields
    2) rendering with fields”

    AE reads the clips as progressive when I click “match source” in the render window. I don’t know what pulldown means but I’d be glad to learn what it is.

    EDIT:

    I interpreted the footage as “upper line first” and the interlacing is gone which is what I wanted to achieve. But the rendering time hasn’t change.

  • Ryan Delos reyes

    November 5, 2014 at 12:40 am in reply to: Chaining the Opacity of an Adjustment Layer…

    Hi Dan,

    My suggestion may not be helpful to you know but I thought about posting a solution anyways for other people that might encounter the problem like myself. Here’s what I encountered and a solution that I got.

    PROBLEM: Multiple layers on premiere pro stacked on top of each other with an adjustment layer on top. My adjustment layer has a vignette in it with a fade-in opacity. Gradual fade-in won’t work with keyframes made in the opacity tab of the adjustment layer. Changing the blend modes didn’t help neither.

    OBSERVATION and SOlution: My video layers are a mix of .psds, after effects dynamic links, and .mov videos. When I turned off the layer with the psd in it, the fade-in opacity in the adjustment layer worked! Not sure why it turned out that way.

    Solution: Put the layers (below the adjustment layer) in a nested sequence. It worked on my project.

    Cheers

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy