Robert Glanns
Forum Replies Created
-
Lack of CP200-series support is the only reason why I have not purchased a whole new Resolve system. I want to spend my money NOW, but using a Wave panel would be a huge step back for me.
I’m very sad that BMD does not seem to want to support this panel set, because a large number of professional Apple Color users (in other words, the very people that are itching to abandon Apple Color for Resolve) own it and use it.
It would be great if BMD would communicate it’s intentions or commitments for specific future panel support. If there are no plans to support this particular panel set, then I can move on and reallocate my equipment budget to other things, instead of waiting and hoping that my large investment in CP200’s will have been worth it, for Resolve support.
-
I have to agree that lack of CP200 support is the ONLY reason why I have not already purchased a Resolve system. The Wave panel is good for what it is, but is in no way a replacement for a more robust panel like the CP200’s!
I have the check to Blackmagic all written out and ready to go, but I won’t send my money to them until CP200 support is added to Resolve.
-
Yup, single-track decomposing is nothing new to us masochistic Color users 🙂
I like to use EditMule’s AutoCollapse tool to automatically flatten FCP sequences. Saves a ton of drudge work!