Forum Replies Created

Page 2 of 3
  • Robert Allan

    June 21, 2008 at 6:29 pm in reply to: MPEG2 Artifacts w/ Compressor 3.0.3

    Seated interviews, so not much movement. I’ve decreased the data rate to 5 mbps and it seems to have solved the problem. Thanks!

  • Robert Allan

    June 21, 2008 at 6:17 pm in reply to: MPEG2 Artifacts w/ Compressor 3.0.3

    VBR, 2 pass, de-interlaced

  • Robert Allan

    June 21, 2008 at 2:11 pm in reply to: MPEG2 Artifacts w/ Compressor 3.0.3

    I’ve played back in Quicktime and burned DVD’s to confirm. You can see the artifacts in each. Thoughts…?

  • Robert Allan

    June 21, 2008 at 12:02 am in reply to: MPEG2 Artifacts w/ Compressor 3.0.3

    Once Compressor has made the MPEG2 and the AC-3 files for the clip, I’m dragging them into DVD Studio Pro 4 as a “track” and then watching that track in the Simulator. Thanks for any help…

  • Robert Allan

    May 23, 2008 at 3:07 am in reply to: scanning photos for HD

    I’ve found FCP suffidient for the work that I do. The motion tab takes some learning and finesse, but I’ve found it to do ok. I hear After Effects is superior. I don’t know anyone who’s using Motion to do photo moves. Sorry…

  • Robert Allan

    April 23, 2008 at 3:18 pm in reply to: scanning photos for HD

    WOW! OK… so it appears that dpi is not the most important factor. Poor assumption on my part. I guess it’s the SIZE of the image that impacts the end quality? I’m scanning photos of every size for this project that will ultimately be 1080i. They will be cut over interviews that haven’t been conducted yet, so it’s difficult to say how much movement will be needed on each photo. I’m assuming there’s no safe “universal standard” to cover me while I’m scanning? I’ll need to scan the larger ones at one resolution and the smaller ones at a better resolution so they can be enlarged? Thanks everyone for your input…

  • Robert Allan

    April 23, 2008 at 2:56 pm in reply to: Anamorphic vs Letterbox footage

    Great tip! Thanks!

  • Robert Allan

    April 13, 2008 at 9:21 pm in reply to: Anamorphic vs Letterbox footage

    Got it. Thanks for your time & help…

  • Robert Allan

    April 12, 2008 at 9:45 pm in reply to: Mixing formats in timeline

    I’m dealing with the EXACT same issue on an earlier thread:
    https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/8/983161
    DVX100A is 4×3 letterbox. DSR500 is anamorphic. My footage was shot with the exact same cameras. You can simply capture the DSR500 footage as anamorphic. Capture the DVX100A footage as 4×3. Make sure your sequence timeline is 4×3. It will accept the DVX footage looking letterboxed and it will automatically letterbox the anamorphic footage so it is displayed properly in a 4×3 project. The masking might be slightly off, but you can scale that to match.
    My problem is that I need my sequence timeline and my final project to be anamorphic, and it sounds like I can’t make the letterboxed footage display properly in an anamorphic project.
    Oh well… Good luck!

  • Robert Allan

    April 12, 2008 at 8:45 pm in reply to: Anamorphic vs Letterbox footage

    Working with a 4×3 timeline, I know everything can be made to look letterboxed. I’m trying to find someway to keep this project anamorphic, but it sounds like that can’t happen unless I zoom (or scale) past the letterbox bars… Is there any way in FCP to stretch only the top & bottom of the frame without zooming in…?
    Thanks for the help…

Page 2 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy