[Rob-art Morgan]

RESULTS WITH ONE GTX TITAN

V01 04 blur nodes 60 fps
V02 08 blur nodes 36 fps
V03 16 blur nodes 20 fps
V04 32 blur nodes 11 fps
V05 64 blur nodes 06 fps
V06 01 NR 2 nodes 16 fps
V07 03 NR 2 nodes 06 fps
V08 06 NR 2 nodes 03 fps

System:
MacPro 5,1 3.33GHz Hex-Core/ 24GB RAM / Sonnet Tempo SSD Pro
OSX 10.8.4
Resolve v9.1.4
Slot 4: Sonnet Tempo SSD Pro with dual 6Gb/s SSDs
Slot 3: empty
Slot 2: empty
Slot 1: GeForce GTX TITAN (rendering & display)

[Rob-art Morgan]

V01 04 blur nodes 50 fps
V02 08 blur nodes 50 fps
V03 16 blur nodes 43 fps
V04 32 blur nodes 25 fps
V05 64 blur nodes 12 fps
V06 01 NR 2 nodes 41 fps
V07 03 NR 2 nodes 16 fps
V08 06 NR 2 nodes 8 fps

ProMax ONE+
2 x 3.6GHz GHz 8-Core Sandy Bridge-EP Xeons (32 total logical cores)
Intel W2600CR motherboard
64G 1600MHz RAM
Windows 7 Professional x64

slot-1 – GTX 770 (1137MHz, 4G GDDR5)
slot-2 – GTX 770 (1137MHz, 4G GDDR5)
slot-3 – GTX 770 (1058MHz, 2G GDDR5)
slot-4 – GTX 770 (1058MHz, 2G) GDDR5
(all four slots are 16 lane)

[Rob-art Morgan]

Not according to OpenGL Driver Monitor. It shows a significant load on all GPUs installed. And as I reported in a recent article, the difference between one, two, three, four and five GPUs is dramatic in the case of Resolve as well as Octane Render: https://barefeats.com/gpu680v7.html

[Rob-art Morgan]

Note: I set playback to 500 FPS to force the playback to go as fast as possible.

[Rob-art Morgan]

Five GeForce GPUs

V01 04 blur nodes 60 fps
V02 08 blur nodes 60 fps
V03 16 blur nodes 55 fps
V04 32 blur nodes 33 fps
V05 64 blur nodes 17 fps
V06 01 NR 2 nodes 57 fps
V07 03 NR 2 nodes 20 fps
V08 06 NR 2 nodes 10 fps

System:
MacPro 5,1 3.33GHz Hex-Core/ 24GB RAM / Sonnet Tempo SSD Pro
OSX 10.8.4
Resolve v9.1.4
Slot 4: empty
Slot 3: empty
Slot 2: Cubix Desktop 4 HIC
Slot 1: GeForce GTX 580 Classified (rendering & display)
Cubix Desktop 4 with two GTX 680s and two GTX 770s.