Thank you, Joseph! Great article. I wish I had seen it earlier.
We’ll probably wind up in Bridge, but we had some hesitations because it doesn’t play MXFs right now (or the raw XF codec structures from the camera). But we should probably transcode everything to ProRes anyway, right?
I’m impressed by how you manage projects at the filesystem level with the clients/client-name/project-name structure, too. We just make the client name part of the project folder, but this might be better.
Question: Would you set up the filesystem organization any differently if you knew going in that one set of footage would be feeding multiple projects? IE make a sort of media pool in a static location that projects can draw from without having to store multiple copies of the footage close to each?
– philip