Forum Replies Created

Page 2 of 2
  • Pascal Desfoux

    March 7, 2006 at 5:20 pm in reply to: HD rendering at 60Fps.

    Dear Steve,
    Thanks a lot for your prompt reply.

    So for original render @ 60Fps (no fields),the right workflow for NTSC is :
    – Import .tga seq. 60Fps (no fields) in AE
    – Go to interpret footage & set interpret @ 59,94Fps.
    – Open a new comp. with settings 1920×1080 @ 59,94Fps.
    – Go to render with settings 1920×1080 @ 29,97Fps. with fields

    & for PAL it should be :
    – Import .tga seq. 60Fps (no fields) in AE
    – Go to interpret footage & set interpret @ 50Fps.(say 50, no Twixtor, OK?)
    – Open a new comp. with settings 1920×1080 @ 50Fps.
    – Go to render with settings 1920×1080 @ 25Fps. with fields

    In the PAL case the animation will render a little bit slower, of course.

    Do you confirm my interpretation of your answer ?
    Do you confirm it’s better to render original material @ twice frame rate to obtain with this workflow the best HD interlaced image ?
    Do you confirm that with this workflow (double frame rate) any interlaced image is formed of two FULL field, giving a better result ?

    Thanks in advance Steve for your attention & have a nice H-day !
    Pascal

  • Hi Aaron,

    Does your values works with PAL?
    Thanks for your energy !
    Pascal

  • Pascal Desfoux

    February 8, 2006 at 9:53 am in reply to: Help with an effect…

    You have to make your text with a mak (Illustrator or Photoshop)& to follow the Matt Dalos tutorial, here on the Cow :

    https://forums.creativecow.net/cgi-bin/page_wrapper.cgi?forumid=2&page=https://www.creativecow.net/articles/dallos_matt/fire/index.html

    Friendly.
    Pascal

  • Pascal Desfoux

    December 23, 2005 at 8:24 pm in reply to: Who’s been working with HDV?

    I’m using AE @1920×1080 with no compression.
    I work in PAL (I’m in Italy)
    I/E for an HD 1920×1080 interlaced : Render your work in AE @ 50Fps @ 1920×1080 in .tga sequence no field, then re-import this rendered sequence in AE with footage interpretation @ 50Fps, but putting this sequence in a 25Fps composition & now render this comp @ 25Fps with fields @ 1920×1080. You’ll get a very clean HD @ 1920×1080 interlaced.

    Anyway, I’ve asked +/- same question on this forum one year ago & now I know that there are no precise rules for HD (just think about the many formats, 1920, 720, P or I) It’s all depends of the final use of your work.

    Don’t think to save space disk & money with HD !
    Best regards & best wishes for the new year.
    Pascal

  • Pascal Desfoux

    November 7, 2005 at 10:38 am in reply to: 3d invig and shadows?

    Try to import on a new layer in the same comp only the mask of the text or shape you created in Illustrator > Put it in time-line @ same position of your Invig. layer > Make it 3D > Check cast shadows + Eventually make the mask parent of the Invig layer if you need to move the Invig. Normally it works. (In some cases you need to render apart only the shadow & to recomp
    the shadow with the rest of your clip)

    Pascal

Page 2 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy