Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 3
  • Nelson Torres

    November 5, 2011 at 8:13 am in reply to: Final Cut Pro 7 after Mac OS X Lion 10.7 upgrade

    While in the Finder click on the GO menu. Press the ‘option’ key and it will appear.

  • Nelson Torres

    September 3, 2011 at 6:05 pm in reply to: Problem with Motion Stabilization

    Thanks! I’ll try those suggestions.

  • Nelson Torres

    August 31, 2011 at 12:17 am in reply to: I need to vent

    Why do we need to learn a new way of working when the ‘old’ way was just fine? Reinventing the wheel by making it square and then having to learn how to compensate for it’s corners seems like an exercise in futility. All they had to do was update the underpinnings of the software and leave ‘The Magic Timeline’ and the rest of that nonsense for the Harry Potter crowd.

  • Nelson Torres

    August 5, 2011 at 11:31 pm in reply to: Let’s get ready to rumble…

    Is three months not long enough to master FCPX? I thought it had innovated the post process so that a monkey could edit?

    @NSLog “Joking”;

  • Nelson Torres

    July 30, 2011 at 3:05 pm in reply to: Andrew Balis Talks FCP X: The Timeline

    Checkerboarding is a task only if you wait until the end to do it. Personally I don’t like the timeline doing anything for me because I don’t want to waste any time undoing what the computer may do automatically. Many of my colleagues finds the new paradigm very cumbersome. For instance all of my clips are labeled SC01S01AT01 (scene/shot/take). I don’t want the computer to start collating all my Med Shots or shots with people together and messing up my numbering systems. The timeline is a complete disaster. Apple simply doesn’t want the Broadcast & Theatrical market. They have even admitted it. Too bad FCP was a great program and was taking over the business. Now it will all be going back to Avid.

  • Nelson Torres

    July 30, 2011 at 7:18 am in reply to: Ask yourself this question

    So to keep their customers happy, come out with FCP 8(64 bit) & 9 while they continue to develop FCP X(They got more money than the US). When FCP X is ready then release. It would have been a lot more successful.

  • Nelson Torres

    July 30, 2011 at 7:11 am in reply to: Andrew Balis Talks FCP X: The Timeline

    The guys heart in the right place but it’s still ‘snake oil’. In FCP 7 you can cut audio & picture at the same time. On the secondary video track you can lengthen or shorten and won’t throw anything else out of sync. The clip collision ‘protection’ is bogus. If you set up your timeline properly (checker boarding your various organized tracks) to begin with you won’t run into any of these errors ergo there was no need for idiot proofing FCP. I guess if you’re cutting talking heads it’s pretty useful. Make your radio cut then pepper in your b-roll but for me these so called improvements are cumbersome in narrative story telling.

  • Nelson Torres

    July 23, 2011 at 7:18 am in reply to: Magnetic Timeline

    Cool! Thanks!

  • I happen to like Stockhausen for example

    Ok, that explains everything…

  • Nelson Torres

    July 13, 2011 at 11:50 pm in reply to: a really good quote

    FCPX sure is an Ass Berger.

Page 1 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy