I’m curious, while we are on the subject of car dealers.
Most local car ads are either the Crazy Eddie screaming monster truck style, or manufacturer beauty shots with a donut, or a combination, usually involving the cute children of the dealership owner.
I do not see too many original beauty shot local car ads – aside from the higher cost of production, do car manufacturers have anything to say about how their products are portrayed in advertising that they do not endorse?
For example, if a local Lexus spot has some sweeping shots of the car, the trim, the dash, the tires, the cupholders, etc – these are images of the car – so the spot is selling the Lexus L923x as opposed to promoting the dealership.
Similarly, a local supermarket may run a spot promoting Milano cookies, 2/$4. But what if they have sweeping beauty shots of the Milano cookie, a closeup of the chocolate filling, a shot of someone luxuriously biting into a cookie – then the spot is selling Milano cookies.
In other words, local spots are being made at the dealer’s expense to sell a product they do not make, but a product they sell. Is there a difference from a business/IP point of view?
See what I’m asking?
Mike