Forum Replies Created

Page 5 of 20
  • Michael Hadley

    April 13, 2017 at 3:36 pm in reply to: Multicam Clip Timecode issue

    Yes, makes sense. A solid workaround. Thanks.

  • Michael Hadley

    April 13, 2017 at 3:36 pm in reply to: Multicam Clip Timecode issue

    Thanks, Doug. Awesome, elegant solution!!

    That said, don’t you think we should be able to specify which clip/angle in a multicam the timecode reader/generator takes it’s marching orders from?

    Thanks again.

  • Michael Hadley

    February 10, 2017 at 4:07 pm in reply to: Ingest duplicates Original Media

    Yes, thanks for this.

    Totally understand and want the Pro Res files place in my storage location.

    It’s the unnecessary/unwanted duplicate “original media” files that is a problem, as it reduces storage capacity on my external drives by 50% until I spend time manually deleting. Shame this functionally can’t be turned off. Seems like an easy fix.

  • Michael Hadley

    December 8, 2016 at 6:56 pm in reply to: So how are we all getting on with 10.3?

    Mixed bag. Some of the new feature are great–workspaces, lanes. Some I’m getting used to.

    That said, I’ve primarily been working with it on updated/existing projects–not brand new 10.3.1 libraries. I’m finding it very crashy, beach bally. Yuck.

    Maybe brand new 10.3.1 projects work great? Updated ones on my right-trashcan, external Pegasus T-bolt 2 drives—not good.

  • Michael Hadley

    February 18, 2016 at 12:13 am in reply to: Force relink

    Totally agree.

    I did notice recently that I was able to relink a stock music WAV file with it’s .MP3 demo version. That seemed–don’t recall it could do that before. (But maybe it could).

    But yes, force relink would be fantastic.

  • Michael Hadley

    February 2, 2016 at 11:16 pm in reply to: Best Sharpener Tool for FCPX

    Yes, I do think the X filter is good. And like I said, I like it combination with the sharpen in Neat. Good luck!

  • Michael Hadley

    February 2, 2016 at 11:10 pm in reply to: File Names in Multicam Clips

    Dang. That is strange. Wish I had more to say other than file a bug report/feature request.

  • Michael Hadley

    February 2, 2016 at 10:39 pm in reply to: File Names in Multicam Clips

    Hmm. That is odd. You sure you’re actually renaming the file name and not a different metadata attribute like a keyword or something?

  • Michael Hadley

    February 2, 2016 at 7:48 pm in reply to: File Names in Multicam Clips

    Hmm. When you select two or more clips to create a multicam, X automatically brings up a dialog box where you can name/rename the new Multicam clip. That’s your opportunity to name the new multicam clip—but it will not affect the name of the underlying clips. (Although you can rename those at anytime as well).

  • Michael Hadley

    February 2, 2016 at 7:44 pm in reply to: Best Sharpener Tool for FCPX

    No doubt that old footage is very grainy, too, right? You can get rid of video noise AND sharpen your images with the denoiser from Neat Video. It’s $99 and it works terrifically. You do have to customize the setting to include the sharpening, though, but it’s pretty easy.

    Don’t be put off by Neat’s website–which is a throwback to the ’90s. The plug in is top notch.

    As well, and in addition, you can also throw on the sharpen filter that’s free in FCPX. That and Neat Video make a good combination.

    I used it recently on some very low lights scenes on this project with excellent results:

    https://youtu.be/LU3aoDqfyDI

    Good luck.

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

Page 5 of 20

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy