Forum Replies Created

  • Mason Kibler

    May 12, 2015 at 3:00 am in reply to: Manageable Film Audio Setup

    Ty,

    Thanks for the feedback on the Samson. I’m glad you brought up the specs, because that’s what drew me to the Audix in the first place. The sensitivity and noise on that seem really good (14 dB A-Weighted/80 S>N, 15 mv/PA–which is nearly identical to the MK41 capsule); and I’m guessing the biggest issue people have with it is the tone. That’s exactly the type of thing I’d love to have to deal with in post, over noise or having to clean up a low signal. I’ve decided to go with the Audix and if I can’t swing both the NTG2 and a nice softie on top of that, I’ll probably just get the best protection I can afford and try to shoot the Audix outside with lavs as backup. In my budget, I feel like picking up as little background as possible is what will deem it the least “amateur”. That’s the goal, anyway.

    Thanks to both of you for the help.

  • Mason Kibler

    May 10, 2015 at 4:03 am in reply to: Manageable Film Audio Setup

    [Brian Reynolds] “This why I’m saying shoot and produce a Mini Doco first perhaps with some borrowed gear to get your head around various work flows.”

    I might have to do that. We have two table reads scheduled, so I’m going to have the camera operator record some “behind the scenes” as a practice run during the first, then do a few scenes with blocking in the second and record that as well. It’ll just be tough for me to really monitor since I’ll be at the table. I can always write a sketch for some of the actors to be in and call it an ice-breaker.

  • Mason Kibler

    May 10, 2015 at 3:56 am in reply to: Manageable Film Audio Setup

    Thanks Brian. From the looks of it, I’m just going to have to stomach the post-work as I can’t seem to find a good alternative to DSLR–at least not for now and given that I already own the DSLR and lenses. I’ll just try to be as organized as possible with on-set workflow.

    Back to microphones, is an Audix SCX1-HC a good option for all around use? If I limited my outdoors, or perhaps used the lavs and blended in the Audix outdoors, would that suffice? I know this is probably like asking a Nascar driver what he thinks about the Ford Focus, but I want to find the sweet spot within my budget.

    NTG3 videos I’ve seen sound really reflective indoors. Every video I see with an NTG 2 or even 3 seems to sound like they are recording a podcast, or that the dialog has been dubbed after in an insulated vocal booth. Maybe I have a strange preference, but I’d almost rather it be too thin than that boomy. Am I in the minority here? It’s hard for me to determine how much of this is the mic and how much is the lack of post-production (EQ, filters, etc.) other than maybe levels. The problem is, anyone using a low-budget mic is probably an inexperienced user. I’d love to see what a pro does with the same gear.

  • Mason Kibler

    May 10, 2015 at 3:18 am in reply to: Manageable Film Audio Setup

    I think I’m missing something glaringly obvious, so I apologize.

    The chain in my head would be: MICS(s) > XLR > RECORDER > 3.5″ OUT > DSLR. I would not be able to monitor at the DSLR, so yes, I could potentially miss something there. However, I could still monitor and record to card at the recorder in the event the DSLR doesn’t record properly. Even if there was a flaw in the DSLR recording 50% of the time, that’s still 50% less I have to worry about sorting and syncing in post. However, if you’re saying that audio file would be worse, or even just different if I had to sync from the card at some point, then I wouldn’t want to go down that road. I’d rather slightly worse audio that sounds the same the whole way through than bouncing back and forth between that and slightly better.

    I’m guessing we’ll never have the time to shoot more than a couple scenes on a single day, so even just having a dozen cards would mean I could make 6 pairs (6 video, 6 audio). Label each pair “Scene 1, Take 1-10”, “Scene 2 Take 1-12” etc. At the very least, that would allow me to–at the end of each shooting day–transfer each pair one at a time, sync with a lot less to sort through, then reformat for the next day. Essentially, do sorting and syncing as we go and always change the cards on each device at the same time so I don’t have to match up a dozen video cards with three audio cards. Ideally, the number of files on each card in a pair would match (assuming audio/video both get cut each time). Am I oversimplifying this? I feel like I’m missing something here, too.

  • Mason Kibler

    May 10, 2015 at 2:35 am in reply to: Manageable Film Audio Setup

    Didn’t even consider that part. So you’re saying running the actual mix into a DSLR (which never even occurred to me) would not be an option due to…how it handles the audio file? And the VC would keep it uncompressed? I get why that’s not an option with multiple sources unless I mix while shooting.

    It won’t be a one man team on set, but it will be in post: me. I just assumed I’d spend a long long time syncing and sorting because I had to, not because I chose that option.

    I’m now thinking I may want to hop over to the video forums to find a plausible alternative. I hate losing the DOF of DSLR, and I’m guessing even a cheap comparable VC would run in the thousands.

    If that doesn’t work, I’m going to buy a ton of SD cards and pair them up after each couple of takes with labels. Wouldn’t really add time since I can change cards with each lighting setup.

    You’ve been a great help!

  • Mason Kibler

    May 10, 2015 at 1:09 am in reply to: Manageable Film Audio Setup

    It’s three 22(ish) minute scripts that are self-contained as a mini-season with very few open ends. They’ll be premiered at a local artsy movie theater that we have connections with in the fall . Luckily, my community has a pretty active group of artistic folks who love this type of thing. It has an Austin/Ashville kinda vibe to it and even has a few film festivals. The plan is to premiere physically then repeat if possible for a month or so–ending with it either being on Vimeo or possibly IndieReign.com. All of this with the message of “we want to make some more.” The story has a heavy focus on the local area which we think will spark a lot of interest. It’s also extremely dialog and B-Roll heavy–cinema verite type of thing. No action shots, or big shots; and probably never more than 3 speaking parts in a single shot.

    I understand the concern about changing production quality if we were to make more later, but I’m just so skeptical about renting (buying a camera, lenses, mics, etc not gonna happen). We’re shooting mostly Sundays, and renting single days is rarely an option. I’d be renting for 60 days for 8 days of actual shooting. The cost of that, even, might be out of our range. I’m also convinced one of our main guys (DP, camera guy, what have you) will be more than equipped to handle production flow, since he does that on a daily basis working for a commercial video production company.

    “The DSLR / separate recorder adds lots more work to your production.”
    – Can you elaborate? I’m not entirely sure what specific work is made more difficult. I would think the process of slating and syncing would be the same. I can patch the Tascam 70d (or whatever recorder I use) into the camera to assist in post. What might I be missing? I’m guessing our camera guy will know more than I do about this part as my experiences are entirely with DSLR.

    I’m certainly open to the NTG3 from a price standpoint, but will that work indoors well enough? Again, it’s very dialog heavy with a good chunk of interiors. Very few exteriors that can’t be controlled, or at least chosen for optimal conditions.

    Thanks a ton for the help!

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy