Forum Replies Created

Page 3 of 3
  • Mark Palmer

    October 29, 2005 at 7:08 am in reply to: Splitting long footage for saving to DVDs

    There’s no timecode on the tape, that’s the problem, so I can’t just recapture, as I don’t have it set to know exactly where it all begins.

  • Mark Palmer

    October 29, 2005 at 5:14 am in reply to: Splitting long footage for saving to DVDs

    Why? I already did a substantial bit of editing on the 5GB file on the HD, and I want to save the original footage to DVD as backup, but I can’t fit it on a 4.3GB disk. If I recaptured the original footage from scratch, I’d have to go in and realign it with the editing. Not impossible, certainly, but a bit more of a hassle than I’d like to deal with.

  • Mark Palmer

    October 29, 2005 at 4:33 am in reply to: Splitting long footage for saving to DVDs

    Okay, thanks. I never understood the diff between checking the box marked self-contained and not, but you clarified it for me. Thanks again.

  • Mark Palmer

    October 29, 2005 at 3:57 am in reply to: Splitting long footage for saving to DVDs

    I think I may not have articulated this well.

    I already have the footage in 1 big 5+GB file on my HD, and I need to split it up into 2 parts to save it into the space of a 4.3GB DVD. I want to keep the footage as is and not re-capture in smaller chunks, so that I can reconstruct the original later on if need be.

    When I split the file in FCP, using the razorblade, then creating 2 sequences, each sequence comes out way smaller than I would have expected. That’s the problem I’m trying to figure out. Why would a straight, uncompressed FCP movie file from NTSC miniDV footage come out about 4x smaller, when I am simply trying to make an exact copy of it, split in two, without any added compression whatsoever? Am I missing something?

  • Mark Palmer

    July 1, 2005 at 5:31 pm in reply to: XML question

    Yeah, I would MUCH prefer to work with the EDL, since the info that is set up there is so much simpler and is basically all that I need. But I guess XML is what it will have to be.

    (Sorry for the multiple postings!)

  • Mark Palmer

    July 1, 2005 at 5:29 pm in reply to: XML question

    Thanks, I’ll look into it. I was thinking of using Perl to generate the XML code from scratch (or a basic template) anyway, so maybe this will save me time.

  • Mark Palmer

    July 1, 2005 at 5:28 pm in reply to: XML question

    Thanks, I’ll look into it. I was thinking of using Perl to generate the XML code from scratch (or a basic template) anyway, so maybe this will save me time.

  • Mark Palmer

    July 1, 2005 at 5:27 pm in reply to: XML question

    Thanks, I’ll look into it. I was thinking of using Perl to generate the XML code from scratch (or a basic template) anyway, so maybe this will save me time.

Page 3 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy