Replies – Forums – Lucas Werneck

Forum Replies Created

Lucas Werneck
December 10, 2015 at 6:15 pm in reply to: NFS sharing fcpx projects

Whats the problem of using NFS for FCPX?
I’ve been using and it’s ok. Some problems appeared on Yosemite has some problems with NFS but it appears to be ok on El Capitan.
The SMB2 on El Capitan also appears to be even better then everything else but FCPX still needs SAN or NFS for libraries. Which in my opinion is VERY strange.
Regards,
Lucas Werneck
April 8, 2015 at 8:27 am in reply to: FCPX NFS tuning

I see, so why the trick to quit and reopen?
Just to use NFS to open libraries and since it’s not fast enough (for you, on your server) you trick quiting and reopening once mounted as AFP or SMB?
Is that right?
Thanks,
Lucas Werneck
April 8, 2015 at 7:19 am in reply to: NFS sharing fcpx projects

John, did you still have NFS issues?
I’ve made a previous test with NFS and didn’t had a problem.
What issues normally appeared?
Regards,
Lucas Werneck
April 8, 2015 at 7:17 am in reply to: FCPX NFS tuning

Hi Simon,
Please, can you elaborate why do you do the “workaround” of quiting and tricking FCPX changing the mount type (NFS to AFP)?
I’ve made some previous tests with NFS and didn’t had a problem. Did you?
Regards,
Lucas Werneck
June 27, 2011 at 2:22 am in reply to: Why most of the the “Trainers” are so positive about X-FCP

Hi folks,
I’m an ACT and participate in many apple trainer forums. I can assure you many like me didn’t like this move from apple, and like you we’re in the dark.
The thing is that probably the 50million iMovie users that would be transitioning will not “need” training because for iMovie person it’s seamless.
The new ones will not have any problem using it for the first time.
Our students were in majority employees and freelancers for companies, production houses and etc. Those will not need a training (at least not many of them) because where they work will not adopt FCPX. I don’t think that every trainer is liking this.
Lucas Werneck
June 24, 2011 at 3:32 pm in reply to: CatDV and FCPX

Hi Matt, I don’t know where did you find FCPX’s MAM functionality but I think that you’ll need to revisit your MAM definitions.
cheers,
Lucas Werneck
June 23, 2011 at 7:19 am in reply to: FCS – r.i.p. 2011

Thanks again guys,
I’m from Brazil.
I really need some idea of investment in order to begin planing it. I don’t need a complete quote as it now, maybe in a week or so. But just a figure would help me a lot!
Thanks,
Lucas Werneck
June 22, 2011 at 4:48 pm in reply to: FCS – r.i.p. 2011

Thanks guys,
I think WebClient would be perfect for 50%, but the “problem” is that clients should “search” in CatDV and then send the results to FCP7 to edit (since FCPX is lame and schizophrenic). I know that WebClient wouldn’t do that, right?
I need also that all clients could possible ingest to server, add metadata, search and sent to fcp.

Maybe I think I’ll need
12 CatDV Pro Clients
1 CatDV Server
I can’t find any price information about the server (besides upgrades and bundles). Can anyone shed some light?
Thanks!
Lucas Werneck
June 22, 2011 at 4:33 am in reply to: FCS – r.i.p. 2011

Ok, I confess I’m a FCSVR user.
Now, despite the XML in FCPX problem (let’s say this will be solved I presume), if I have 10 editing stations and 8 production stations (also with FCP7) what I should need to migrate from FCSVR to CatDV (I have one license of the standalone pro)?
Thanks