I don’t really have anything against Resolve Color Management, other than I am suspicious of attempts to deploy proprietary approaches.
Also before I was ready to embrace ACES, when it was in the Release 0.n versions, I took the trouble to reverse- engineer linear transforms of my own, with the help of various cinematographers, charts, many cameras and a lot of patience and scope reading.
For log projects, ACES is an automatic, pretty much default choice for me now. If something isn’t working, something is wrong — and I will choose the shortest, simplest strategy every time. Choose the I/O transforms, apply them, go to work. I do not support LUT displays for judgement or conversion. On one hand, too crude, on the other, no control.
In the past, I have developed tables for the User Interface — so that clients looking over my shoulder do not question the pass-through values that may appear differently on the Resolve edit/grade preview pane. It is absolutely why it is not the best, first choice for making grade judgements when they have to count. I also only use Client-3 Calman profiles developed with a sensitive probe for my iMac and do not use Apple characterizations. For so many reasons. The main system graphic display for the User Interface was almost close-enough after some time spent with CalMan just creating an Advanced User RGB balance in the monitor’s own adjustment software. Actually close enough to not bother with a display LUT. It’s better when there are fewer interventions.
jPO, CSI
\”I always pass on free advice — its never of any use to me\” Oscar Wilde.