Forum Replies Created

  • Joppo Te veldhuis

    April 5, 2014 at 5:56 am in reply to: Compact VideoHub- User experiences

    bit late, but:
    i have a compact 40-40 BMD sdi switch.
    it does dual link 10bit, and even dual link 12-bit RGB. (not official supported though)
    i also use it for capturing streams from one computer to another and its always seemsless. also in 12bits.

    http://www.degrot.com

  • Joppo Te veldhuis

    April 15, 2013 at 5:06 am in reply to: f55 to proresproxies

    nope. reading from usb disk. writing to fw800 raid disk (gspeed q)

    http://www.degrot.com

  • Joppo Te veldhuis

    November 12, 2009 at 8:38 am in reply to: slow renders on fcp+nehalem

    okay, i know fcp should be faster, but my problem is now that my nehalem-cpu renders like 5x slower than my 2006 macpro…
    update: fcp on the nehalem does a full realtime playback in HD with multiple layers/effects. so it IS fast, but when it comes to actually rendering, it slows down like crazy.
    i did a diskspeed test on my internal raid (wich used to work just fine) the readspeeds is about 270MB/SEC and the writespeed is about 6 (!) MB/SEC.
    okay, so the disk is propably broken. so i connected a HUGE-raid-system through fiberoptic 4Gb/sec on my nehalem; ran the speedtest, and read AND write are now above 280Mb/SEC. but then i started working in fcp again and still the actual renders drops down really slow. so maybe not a disk-error?

    http://www.degrot.com

  • Joppo Te veldhuis

    November 12, 2009 at 8:37 am in reply to: slow renders on fcp+nehalem

    okay, i know fcp should be faster, but my problem is now that my nehalem-cpu renders like 5x slower than my 2006 macpro…
    update: fcp on the nehalem does a full realtime playback in HD with multiple layers/effects. so it IS fast, but when it comes to actually rendering, it slows down like crazy.
    i did a diskspeed test on my internal raid (wich used to work just fine) the readspeeds is about 270MB/SEC and the writespeed is about 6 (!) MB/SEC.
    okay, so the disk is propably ****ed. so i connected a HUGE-raid-system through fiberoptic 4Gb/sec on my nehalem; ran the speedtest, and read AND write are now above 280Mb/SEC. but then i started working in fcp again and still the actual renders drops down really slow. so maybe not a disk-error?

    http://www.degrot.com

  • Joppo Te veldhuis

    November 11, 2009 at 8:45 am in reply to: slow renders on fcp+nehalem

    hi jack,
    thnx for the reply
    i know the processors won’t do much in color, but my greatest concern is fcp7 in this case. the cpu is almost laying flat during rendering wich causes unnessesary long rendertimes..

    http://www.degrot.com

  • Joppo Te veldhuis

    October 12, 2009 at 5:43 pm in reply to: FCP7 audio sync drift MEGA-weirdness

    and it’s not an AJA-bug since BM suffers the same thing 😉

    http://www.degrot.com

  • Joppo Te veldhuis

    October 12, 2009 at 5:40 pm in reply to: FCP7 audio sync drift MEGA-weirdness

    i got the same bug. relaying new audio (wich is supposed to be sinc) on the timeline…on two stations. one with a kona3 card and one with a BM HD extreme. the ‘out-of-sinc’ disappears when you disable the videocard. i really really begin to hate FCP.
    the other day i got a 4x HDCAM dump at 11 PM and the audio went out of sinc as descibed above. the client freaked out..
    beginning to question the ‘pro’ on the pro-apps

    http://www.degrot.com

  • Joppo Te veldhuis

    September 17, 2009 at 7:49 am in reply to: 4870 success, so far

    i fixed it…
    you have to connect the usb-hub from the monitor too to make it work
    i guess usb is now a part of the dvi-connection 😉
    apple…

    http://www.degrot.com

  • Joppo Te veldhuis

    December 21, 2008 at 4:07 pm in reply to: Emailing full video file for client

    just do a 8bit/10bit uncompressed qt render. and then zip it in the finder (rightclick-compress…). you will be amazed about the decrease of size 🙂

    http://www.degrot.com

  • Joppo Te veldhuis

    December 21, 2008 at 4:04 pm in reply to: Final Cut Pro Movie File vs Quicktime .Mov file

    the fcp-movie is probably in DV-codec right?
    if you play a dv-file (qt) in the quicktimeplayer on your desktop, it will look blurred/jagged. That’s because dv-files are made to look good on an external video-monitor.
    if the client is gonna use it as a backup or a masterfile for dvd-rendering. the dv-file will do a better job than the lowres qt in h264 or sorensor or whatever compression you’ve been using. if you want a highres qt that will also look good in the desktop-qt-player, you have to use 8bit/10bit or a prores-codec.

    http://www.degrot.com

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy