Did the Card die or the Drives die? I was almost going to get a second 4322 a few weeks ago when we moved into a new office and upgraded an older system, but I decided to get ATTO R380 instead. BEST. DECISION. EVER.
My point is, I really see a significant performance improvement in the R380 vs the RR4322. While I can’t be completely certain that it has something to do with the drives (the RR4322 is pushing 8 2TB drives in a Proavio enclosure and the R380 is pushing 8 1TB drives), things I’ve discovered are:
-The ATTO raid is more consistent in AJA speed tests. The graph lines are almost straight across, vs the 4322, which hits higher overall speeds, but the lines look erratic and dip under 200 often)
-When clicking on the array in finder, there is a delay with the 4322, whereas the R380 is instant.
As soon as we get our next invoice paid, I’ll be yanking the 4322 out and replacing it with a R380 – hopefully next week.
I wonder if you were to swap out the 4322 in your system with a working one – would that bring back your data? If that’s a possibility, I might sell you my 4322 for a significantly reduced price when I take it out of my system. It works and has been working fine for 14 months, but as I said above, the performance isn’t as good as the ATTO. I’d advise you to invest in an Areca or ATTO card in the near future either way. One caveat – if you want 2TB Caviar black drives, go with ATTO. The areca doesn’t play well with those drives.
Good luck!
jd