Replies – Forums – Joe Huggins

Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 8

1 2 … 8 →

Joe Huggins
March 28, 2012 at 6:50 pm in reply to: Red feature consolidate

Thanks Michael. (I’m not sure I remember my last experience either-smile).

Thanks, Film Joe
Joe Huggins
March 27, 2012 at 6:44 pm in reply to: Red feature consolidate

Michael,

I tried to remove my post but it apparently did not get deleted. I do need to work from the R3D files. We have gone back to RedCineX to create the pull list. We had lots of flaws in that last time and I thought maybe a project that was cut on Avid could pull in R3D to the SAN so I could relink with a Resolve.

Can Avid do this more effeciently than RedCineX since it can read Red Raw.

Thanks, Film Joe
Joe Huggins
March 23, 2012 at 5:30 pm in reply to: edit changes in Resolve

If the edit is from an Avid and I dont’ have an XML, is that a problem?

Thanks, Film Joe
Joe Huggins
March 22, 2012 at 10:01 pm in reply to: resolve render compressions

Thanks for all the input. We will do. Best.

Thanks, Film Joe
Joe Huggins
March 21, 2012 at 5:51 pm in reply to: resolve render compressions

Thanks for the confirmation. That was my assumption but I wanted my techs to know for sure. Yes 175x is the 24p and 220x is 1080i, but the same compression format I would assume.

Thanks, Film Joe
Joe Huggins
March 21, 2012 at 4:48 pm in reply to: resolve render compressions

Mike,
So I take it that 175x to 175x is not a quality issue. It would have to go through several compress and recompress stages (multiple color corrections) to be detectable? This material will be used for movie trailers and TV ads at some point. But I only make a daily grade, somoeone else may cut and do a final grade before it airs.

Thoughts?

Thanks, Film Joe
Joe Huggins
March 21, 2012 at 4:21 pm in reply to: resolve render compressions

Mike,

Thanks for the explaination. In your opinion, is there any significant or noticiable image degredation when color correction on Resolve is done to a 175x image? I assume it is nothing like an analog generational loss, but to decompress into RGB, and then export as 175x is that descernable to the eye or just to a detailed technical scope for instance? I guess most network TV shows work from Arri ProRes or Avid 175x camera originals; edit, then color before an air date. No networks complain about that recompression loss do they?

Thanks, Film Joe
Joe Huggins
March 19, 2012 at 8:33 pm in reply to: app store – data

Angelo, thanks, ‘it’s a beautiful thing’ Hard to find by description on the App store categories. Joe

Thanks, Film Joe
Joe Huggins
March 5, 2012 at 9:32 pm in reply to: red feature conform

Michael,

Good to hear from you. This got stuck in my spam filter and I only saw it Monday. We choose to consolidate using an XML and RedCineX.

The project was cut in FCP, but I thought Avid would have a better tool for importing from multiple drives than any other system.

We’ll review this workflow for the next project coming soon with a similar issue.

How’s it feel down in NOLA? Best, Joe

Thanks, Film Joe
Joe Huggins
October 31, 2011 at 6:28 pm in reply to: ALE and AMA – feature post

Michael,

We’re trying that technique. To send you a file, it would be a camera roll. Is there an ftp site we can send it to? Also, this may get more complicated than a Cow answer and perhaps we could contact via email if there needs to be a broader consulting fee arrangement.

I can be reached in Atlanta at https://www.cinefilmlab.com

Thanks, Film Joe

Page 1 of 8

1 2 … 8 →