Forum Replies Created

  • Jim Russell

    May 18, 2010 at 5:12 pm in reply to: Quadro FX baseline performance

    Thanks again Tim –
    I now understand the primary purpose of the Mercury Playback Engine is for RT playback, I had just latched onto the line at Adobe about how it also accelerates rendering for delivery of content to clients. That’s where the primary bog is in my work flow; rendering out a sequence.
    I’ll let clients and budget dictate the choice when I do get around to the upgrade.
    Thanks for your input.
    Jim

  • Jim Russell

    May 17, 2010 at 7:31 pm in reply to: Quadro FX baseline performance

    Thanks Tim
    I appreciate the feedback. I have two XEON quad-cores on a Tyan 5396 mobo, Nvidia Quadro FX 1700 and 16Gb of ram.
    I was looking for a dollar to minute equation for the Quadro FX lineup if I upgraded to the one of the cards compatible with Mercury, but maybe its not so simple? I was hoping to determine if, given a sequence that now renders out in 100 minutes. would only take 50 minutes with a Quadro FX3800 ($1,000), 25 minutes on a 4800($1700), or say 7 minutes with the FX5800 ($3100).
    Buying back the time is what makes the investment a consideration; its just trying to determine what one gets (less time) for the money.
    But again, maybe its not so simple
    Thanks
    Jim

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy