Jennifer
Forum Replies Created
-
Jennifer
September 14, 2005 at 3:51 am in reply to: Broadcast package presentation:4:3 or 16:9 and what display LCD, Plasma ?Hi Steve,
Thanks a lot, these are all great pointers ! I hear a lot good stuff about .wmv recently, so I definitely give it a try. I also like your last point about the presentation itself, these are small things many of us know, but when it comes to do the presentation we often forget due to stress and last minute rush.
I really like the way this thread turned to all these valuable tips on presenting stuff and more, as there are quite many different approaches of doing it.
Cheers,
Jen
-
Jennifer
September 13, 2005 at 9:32 pm in reply to: Broadcast package presentation:4:3 or 16:9 and what display LCD, Plasma ?Thanks very much Andrew and Dave,
Just because it
-
Jennifer
September 12, 2005 at 5:50 pm in reply to: Broadcast package presentation:4:3 or 16:9 and what display LCD, Plasma ?Oh wow, thanks Dave,
I really like the part of you say about broadcasters wanting to see the ability to design the same work in both 4:3 and 16×9. Thanks something I was really hoping to hear !
Working in either 1280×720 or 1920×1080 would be definitely ideal, but would require much more resources and computer power, which I don
-
Jennifer
September 12, 2005 at 4:30 pm in reply to: Broadcast package presentation:4:3 or 16:9 and what display LCD, Plasma ?Thanks Charlie,
Great info, good to about your Plasma findings ! So I guess in your case you
-
Jennifer
July 5, 2005 at 8:08 am in reply to: Final stage of NTSC to PAL conversion using RE:Vision FXThanks very much Pierre and Pete,
I changed the setting and worked like a charm ! I’m really happy with the final quality now!
Cheers,
Jennifer
-
Jennifer
July 5, 2005 at 8:08 am in reply to: Final stage of NTSC to PAL conversion using RE:Vision FXThanks very much Pierre and Pete,
I changed the setting and worked like a charm ! I’m really happy with the final quality now!
Cheers,
Jennifer
-
Jennifer
July 4, 2005 at 5:32 pm in reply to: Final stage of NTSC to PAL conversion using RE:Vision FXThanks a lot Pete,
I made a PAL DVD and the lines disappeared. Actually, I’m really impressed how well it looks ! One thing happened is in the scenes with a lot of motion and camera shake there is a sort of motion “trail”(not too visable, but it’s there). Is that because I set “blend” as a interpotation method in Twixtor ? Shall I set it “nearest” or is there other way of getting rid of it ? Thanks,
Jennifer
-
Jennifer
July 4, 2005 at 5:32 pm in reply to: Final stage of NTSC to PAL conversion using RE:Vision FXThanks a lot Pete,
I made a PAL DVD and the lines disappeared. Actually, I’m really impressed how well it looks ! One thing happened is in the scenes with a lot of motion and camera shake there is a sort of motion “trail”(not too visable, but it’s there). Is that because I set “blend” as a interpotation method in Twixtor ? Shall I set it “nearest” or is there other way of getting rid of it ? Thanks,
Jennifer
-
Jennifer
July 4, 2005 at 6:19 am in reply to: Final stage of NTSC to PAL conversion using RE:Vision FXThanks a lot Jon !
It definitely makes more sense now. I’m still not clear what’s the difference of rendering with fields or applying Reinterlacer, but I post this question in RE:Vision forum. Anyway, thanks a bunch !Cheers,
Jennifer
-
Jennifer
July 3, 2005 at 8:23 pm in reply to: Final stage of NTSC to PAL conversion using RE:Vision FXThanks a lot Jon !
You’re a great help ! I hate technology !
Actually, it