Everyone tells me that there is no information lost. Technically this seems to be the case, but the picture is crap compared to something like ProRes422.
I’m told DNxHD is supposed to be superior to ProRes, so I can only assume that having to process the DNxHD file is causing the artefacts I can see.
If BM were to implement the codec in a more user-friendly manner, or give us the option to select the 0-255 range, then I’m lead to believe this would solve our issues.
I know I’m repeating things already said, but nothing has been done about it yet.
BM……..???????