Greg Howell
Forum Replies Created
-
Very helpful. Thanks!
-
to clarify, i intend to put this on Vimeo..
-
Now i understand walter, thanks!
-
see this is what confusing me. if you were ok with it being a larger file size with each frame being slightly lower in quality, why wouldnt you use 29.97 or 30 fps? – you say that if people in the uk were watching it, then you should use a lower frame rate, but why?; they will be veiwing it through a computer monitor, not a tv. so pal doesnt apply, does it?
thanks,
-
..i’m also happy to sacrifice frame quality and file size
-
ok, so assuming my audience are all using computers most of which are in the uk, will it be ok to leave at 29.97?
-
thanks,
i spoke to adobe, and now i know how to fix.
you simply add a black layer beneath both colored objects (even though its not visible when rendering) – god knows why, but it works.
thanks
-
Hi,
Noise doesn’t help much, it just blends the noise with the blocks. Ive stripped the animation down so that all you have is a solid object changing from a dark blue to a mid purple over 2 seconds.. i still have the same problem!. you can try it yourself. fade from #242432 to #523C58 over 2secs and encode for vimeo – you should see the same thing.
thanks,
-
Hi Ivan,
Thanks for your help.
I tried your suggestion, but it still looks just as bad. I guess im going to have to cover my animation in a grain, and see if that helps. Im just really struggling to believe that with the most sophisticated software from adobe and hd video streaming these days, that wanting to transition from one colour to another over a couple of seconds is asking to much. I mean really? – i cant be the first person whos wanted to animate a colour change before. What would a massive design agency do? so frustrating.
thanks anyway,
Greg
-
Hi Todd,
Yes after encoding via AME you can kind of see the same problem. i guess after its been encoded again by vimeo the problem is magnified. any thoughts?
thanks,