Forum Replies Created

  • Greg Burkat

    May 23, 2009 at 9:55 pm in reply to: hdv (mt2) faster then avi in After Effects

    Hi !

    I made the problem dissapear , now the avi (render using lagarith’s default values) is faster than mt2 files when editing.

    The solution was strange … i replaced my windows vista with windows 7 and it works faster now. With everythin the same – like page file placement and system adjustments .. the only differance is the windows version.

    So .. as you can see if you have asus p5q motherboard or similar ( and you don’t screew your system like i did with vista), You don’t have to buy a hardware raid controller for working with full hd avi’s – at least for low budget productions of course 🙂

    and one last thing, windows 7 is free to use in it’s beta version – You can download it from the microsoft’s website, everything that was designed to work in vista – is working 100% fine in windows7, i thought that it’s to early to work in such a new system – but everything works, drivers and all the programs – and it’s all a little faster than vista.

    hey

  • Greg Burkat

    May 9, 2009 at 8:50 am in reply to: hdv (mt2) faster then avi in After Effects

    Hey, new test after enableing “volume write-back cache” in software raid controller ( intel matrix storage console ) :
    ____________________________________
    render time before / after this option turned on :

    with mt2 files :
    34 sec / 26 sec

    with avi lagarith files :
    37 sec / 32 sec

    with avi uncompressed files :
    39 sec / 48 sec
    _____________________________________

    the avi uncompressed file is the largest one so it’s normal to perform the slowest way if i have a bottleneck .. but when the others have speed up, this type of avi has even slow down more .. I’m confused 😛

  • Greg Burkat

    May 8, 2009 at 9:48 pm in reply to: hdv (mt2) faster then avi in After Effects

    Thanks Kevin !

    Yes it must be a bottleneck problem.

    The Raid0 is controlled by motherboard, sata2

    I unchecked the disc cache, restart and ran the same test – no differance at all when rendering, the speed result was the same.

    So in case of software problems I reinstalled a fresh vista 64bit and the new drivers – the “problem” is still here when rendering.

    So I think that maybe this is simply too much for my motherboard and it needs an external card to control the raid ?

    all of my hard discs are (all 7200rpm speed):
    serial ata1 disc for system
    serial ata2 disc for system page file
    raid 0 with 2 serial ata2 discs for the media files and projects

    is this realy too much and i need a controler?
    _______________________
    my motherboard has:
    storage:

    intel ICH10R SOUTHBRIDGE:
    -6 x SATA 3.0GB/S PORTS
    -INTEL MATRIX STORAGE TECHNOLOGY SUPPORTS RAID 0,1,5,10

    MARVEL 88SE6111 CONTROLLER:
    -1 x ULTRA DMA 133/100/66 FOR UP TO 2 PATA DEVICES

    SILICON IMAGE SIL5723 CONTROLLER (DRIVE EXPERT TECHNOLOGY):
    -2 X SATA 3GB/S PORTS
    -SUPPORTS EZ BACKUP AND SUPER SPEED FUNCTIONS

    AND THE CHIPSET IS INTEL P45 / ICH10R with intel fast memory access technology
    ___________________________

    I simply hope that the problem can be resolved by software way instead of buing a controller. Is there still a chance that something is not configuret correctly ?

    cheers

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy