Graeme Nattress
Forum Replies Created
-
Graeme Nattress
February 9, 2006 at 8:15 pm in reply to: A question about Nattress Film Effects. . .Thanks Scott – that’s most appreciated.
I”m just putting the finishing touches to the new Nattress website now, with the help of my lovely webmistress. I’m putting up more Film Effects movies, including this one:
https://www.nattress.com/Movies/StereoImages.mov
which I think really shows what you can do with the set.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
Graeme Nattress
February 9, 2006 at 1:20 am in reply to: A question about Nattress Film Effects. . .Yes, anamorphic video, whether from a lens or sensor that’s 16:9 work great with Film Effects. You can get some very filmic results that way….
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
[KelMedia] “Thats it!!! No interlaced-induced flicker. Full resolution, No strobing, No jaggies, just a subtle, classy, non-video look.”
If only that really were the case…. You certainly don’t get full resolution or total lack of jaggies via this method.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
Too complex to answer without knowing the full details of the project. For instance, is it drama, documentary or music video? Shot progressive PAL or interlaced?
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
Graeme Nattress
February 8, 2006 at 2:38 pm in reply to: Converting from NTSC to PAL produces stutteringNot in this particular case….
Use Cinema Tools to “conform” the 23.98fps to 25fps, scale up the video in FCP in a PAL timeline and then make the PAL DVD from that.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
SDI out of a decklink or Kona? I know both do strange things to DVCProHD which a deck doesn’t, so it could be something similar? Must admit I’ve not seen issues on uncompressed here, and yes, 10bit is totally buggy – you never quite know what it’s going to do 🙂
G
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
Joe, are you finding scaling issues in FCP5? I thought the filtering in that was quite nice.
Issues with reds are codec related, I’d think. The apps you talk about are all RGB, which means they’d have to translate to get out to video. FCP for the most part works in Y’CbCr space. Actually, the codecs in FCP are not bad – they just look it, but when played back from tape they tend to be great. FCP just doesn’t do filtering for playback on the computer.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
Check out Film Effects at http://www.nattress.com
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
Graeme Nattress
February 7, 2006 at 12:25 pm in reply to: What is the best way to go from “30F” to 24? -
Graeme Nattress
February 7, 2006 at 1:08 am in reply to: What is the best way to go from “30F” to 24?30p on your camera is probably very similar in resolution to 60i, perhaps lower. It’s not true progressive, and the filter that reduces the resolution of interlaced video is most probably still present in 30p mode.
So, 24p from a conversion filter should be very close in quality to what you’d expect from 30p, if you shoot 60i. Converting from your 30f will not produce best results – but the proof is in the pudding – best try the demo and see how you get on.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP