Forum Replies Created

Page 71 of 180
  • Gary Huff

    December 20, 2013 at 5:54 pm in reply to: Anybody HAPPY?

    It looks nice to me on the general front. About to start a big project in it here in the next day or so, so I feel more comfortable knowing the ins and outs when I’m in the middle of it.

    Looking foward to most of the plugins I have been eyeing for a while getting updated to FxPlug3 more than anything.

  • Gary Huff

    December 20, 2013 at 5:19 pm in reply to: Multi Scopes back working in FCPX 10.1 with Scopelink…

    What is the performance like with this plugin? Do the scopes lag much on updating?

  • Gary Huff

    December 19, 2013 at 5:14 pm in reply to: New Motion!

    [Andrew Richards] “I’m also not sure it matters with respect to performance.”

    It probably doesn’t now, but it’s still nice to have. Though, I think an improvement in the visual output that it does would be more welcome than 64-bit at this point when it gets right down to it.

  • Gary Huff

    December 19, 2013 at 4:27 pm in reply to: All I wanted for Xmas …

    [Simon Ubsdell]
    Do you reckon I need to be a bit more persistent?”

    No, that should be good, just making sure you were aware that you could do such a thing.

  • Gary Huff

    December 19, 2013 at 4:27 pm in reply to: Which New Mac Pro CPU Configuration for FCPX 10.1?

    [Jeremy Garchow]
    I stand by my earlier comment, but the biggest SSD you can.”

    Agreed. If you’re getting it now, don’t take the risk.

    I have the 1TB in my new Retina. It’s awesome. I don’t know if I’d need more than 512GB in the Mac Pro though with the external storage options and the fact that it’s not meant to be portable like the laptop is.

  • Gary Huff

    December 19, 2013 at 3:57 pm in reply to: All I wanted for Xmas …

    [Simon Ubsdell] “I just wanted to point out that for me the lack of gang sync and replace edit (the real kind) are actually impediments of such magnitude that I find it really hard to migrate my work to X with any confidence, knowing that I will almost always absolutely require these functions in the course of a typical job. (The workarounds that I have to resort to are teeth-achingly painful and slow.)”

    Have you submitted feature requests within the app?

  • Gary Huff

    December 19, 2013 at 2:47 pm in reply to: All I wanted for Xmas …

    [Adam White] “Now there will be no more disagreements and everyone can coalesce around the new beloved editing system of choice…”

    This is a very nice update all around, though you’ll still have people who find the magnetic timeline is not for them (understandable) or those that don’t realize there have been updates since 10.0.0 (inexcusable).

  • Gary Huff

    December 19, 2013 at 2:46 pm in reply to: Which New Mac Pro CPU Configuration for FCPX 10.1?

    [Kevin Patrick] “Is the flash storage upgradable? I didn’t think it was.”

    I wouldn’t think so. Nor is the GPU from what I can tell, despite the rumors.

    But perhaps an iFixIt teardown would give the final word. Damn those guys…nice shiny hardware and they just rip it open like that!

  • Gary Huff

    December 19, 2013 at 2:39 pm in reply to: New Motion!

    [Andrew Richards] “32-bit so far in my limited testing.”

    Well, crap. Hopefully the output has been improved. Never have cared for the quality of Compressor’s output, especially its scaler, yikes.

  • Gary Huff

    December 19, 2013 at 2:38 pm in reply to: Which New Mac Pro CPU Configuration for FCPX 10.1?

    [Daniel Frome] “If rendering is your primary gig, then more cores are better, but I’ll take a guess and say that the 6 core config will be the fastest option for video editors. 6 cores is already plenty CPU horsepower, with the clock speed ultimately making the most difference in day-to-day editing tasks.”

    Obviously, we need to see some numbers on this, but I would be worried that any MacPro configuration in the 4-core arena (and less than the D700) is going to show only marginal improvement (if any) in day-to-day operations over an iMac with the 780M 4GB. If I was purchasing a MacPro at the moment, I’d be opting for the 8-core D700 32GB RAM version at the bare minimum.

Page 71 of 180

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy