Forum Replies Created

Page 5 of 180
  • Gary Huff

    December 1, 2018 at 5:21 pm in reply to: Is macOS Mojave Ready for FCPX?

    [Craig Seeman] “Some people use plugins.”

    They do. Not all of them using Continuum Complete. I don’t. The OP doesn’t mention Continuum Complete.

  • Gary Huff

    December 1, 2018 at 3:34 pm in reply to: Is macOS Mojave Ready for FCPX?

    I mean in this thread. How do we go from asking if FCPX performance under Mojave to Boris Continuum Complete?

  • Gary Huff

    December 1, 2018 at 3:34 pm in reply to: Frustrated! Poor quality of SD footage in FCP 10.4

    [Rob Postroz] “The camera I shot the footage on was a canon xl1.”

    The XL1 had a “Frame Mode” that was, frankly, not the best way to film on that camera. It was a workaround “de-interlacing” in camera (as opposed to the DVX100 which would give you an actual 29.97 progressive) that caused a resolution loss of around 25%, which I’m sure you’re already aware. However, the footage is still interlaced, not actually progressive. It’s simply trying to emulate the look of progressive within interlaced (as kooky as that sounds).

    [Rob Postroz]I recall many years ago when working in an older version of FCP that these lines would appear when editing this type of footage, but the solution just seemed to be to check a box in the viewer (like view in highest quality or something).

    Have you tried doing this in FCPX? There are similar options. I would also render out a section and see if it still looks the same.

  • Gary Huff

    November 30, 2018 at 10:43 pm in reply to: Is macOS Mojave Ready for FCPX?

    Where was Continuum Complete mentioned?

  • Gary Huff

    November 30, 2018 at 10:41 pm in reply to: Frustrated! Poor quality of SD footage in FCP 10.4

    First of all, Rob, forget everything that has been suggested. To start with, what is the camera these clips were recorded with?

  • Gary Huff

    November 19, 2018 at 2:21 pm in reply to: Is 100mbps h264 better or worse than 100mbps Prores?

    [Chris Wright] “You would think h.264 would have more visible macroblocking due to codec technology as prores uses wavelet encoding”

    ProRes does not use wavelet encoding.

  • How large are your clips in the Original folder?

  • Gary Huff

    October 29, 2018 at 5:26 pm in reply to: How does one make locations look good?

    [ryan elder] “Okay thanks, but I tried that before, and they said that they cannot make real locations look near as good, cause I have no control. “

    Then they weren’t actually set designers.

  • Gary Huff

    October 29, 2018 at 3:38 am in reply to: How does one make locations look good?

    [ryan elder] “In that case, what do you do to get locations look good?”

    Hire a set designer.

  • Gary Huff

    October 22, 2018 at 5:46 pm in reply to: Canon m50 film settings

    [Warren Eig] “I’ve shot at 1/60 and I don’t like the motion blur. It’s personal taste.”

    I’m sure you think you don’t. $100 says you can’t tell the difference in a blind test. Care to put money on the line?

Page 5 of 180

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy